Intel Celeron N6211 vs Intel Atom x7-E3950

VS
Performance
Celeron N6211
1,5914% of 36,991
Atom x7-E395013% better
1,7935% of 36,991

The Atom x7-E3950 has 13% better performance than the Celeron N6211 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N6211
No data available
Atom x7-E3950
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N6211 and the Atom x7-E3950 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N6211
Shop Atom x7-E3950
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron N6211 CPU

The Intel Celeron N6211 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the embedded CPU market. The N6211 is compatible with FCBGA1493 motherboards and is fabricated on a 10 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N6211 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 4,096 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1.5 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N6211 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1200.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3000.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N6211 does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N6211 has the 657th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.30% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Atom x7-E3950 CPU

The Intel Atom x7-E3950 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the embedded CPU market. It launched in Q3 2014. It is part of Intel's Atom x7 lineup, which is based on the Apollo Lake microarchitecture. The x7-E3950 is compatible with Intel BGA 1296 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics 505 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Atom x7-E3950 supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Atom x7-E3950 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Atom x7-E3950 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2000.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Atom x7-E3950 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics 505. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Atom x7-E3950 has the 635th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.85% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron N6211Atom x7-E3950
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Series--Atom x7
Market SegmentEmbeddedEmbedded
Release Date--Q3 2014
Production Status--Active
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron N6211
1,5914% of 36,991
Atom x7-E395013% better
1,7935% of 36,991

The Atom x7-E3950 has 13% better performance than the Celeron N6211 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron N6211 is ranked 657th with a score of 1,591, and the Atom x7-E3950 is ranked 635th with a score of 1,793.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N6211
No data available
Atom x7-E3950
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N6211 and the Atom x7-E3950 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N6211 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Ryzen Embedded V1605B7,177+351%
Atom x7-E39501,793+13%
Celeron N62111,591
Atom x5-E80001,494-6%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N6211 orAtom x7-E3950
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron N6211Atom x7-E3950
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,591
1,793
(+12.7%)
3DMark Time Spy CPU
--
667
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
128
(+2.4%)
125
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
76
(+85.37%)
41
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
--
718
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
--
231
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
2,245
(+7.11%)
2,096
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,586
(+113.75%)
742
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron N6211Atom x7-E3950
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Foundry--Intel
Process Size10 nm14 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron N6211Atom x7-E3950
Series--Atom x7
Microarchitecture--Apollo Lake
Codename--Apollo Lake
Memory Support--DDR3
Memory Channels--Dual-channel
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N6211Atom x7-E3950
Cores24
Threads24
Clock Speed1200.0 MHz1600.0 MHz
Turbo Clock3000.0 MHz2000.0 MHz
Base Clock--100 MHz
Multiplier--16.0x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N6211Atom x7-E3950
L1 Cache4,096 KB56 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB--

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron N6211Atom x7-E3950
SocketFCBGA1493Intel BGA 1296
PCI Express--PCIe 2.0 x4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)6.5 W12 W
Tcase Max--103 °C
TJ Max70 °C110 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron N6211Atom x7-E3950
Integrated Graphics--HD Graphics 505
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, SHA, EIST, Intel 64, XD bit, VT-x, VT-d, TXT, EPT, BPT, AES-NI, CLMUL, RdRand

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.