Performance
Celeron N5105
4,39412% of 36,991
Core i7-7820HQ108% better
9,118.525% of 36,991
The Core i7-7820HQ has 108% better performance than the Celeron N5105 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Celeron N5105
No data available
Core i7-7820HQ
24.1220% of 121.53
The Core i7-7820HQ has 20% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark: Intel Core i5-13400F.
Shop Celeron N5105
Shop Core i7-7820HQ
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Celeron N5105 CPU
The Intel Celeron N5105 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N5105 is compatible with FCBGA1338 motherboards and is fabricated on a 10 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Celeron N5105 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1.5 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron N5105 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2000.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2900.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron N5105 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron N5105 has the 428th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 11.88% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the Intel Core i7-7820HQ CPU
The Intel Core i7-7820HQ is an end-of-life 4-core (8-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2017 with a suggested retail price of $378. It is part of Intel's Core i7 lineup, which is based on the Kaby Lake-H microarchitecture. The i7-7820HQ is compatible with Intel BGA 1440 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics 630 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The Core i7-7820HQ supports DDR4-2400, DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Core i7-7820HQ has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 8 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Core i7-7820HQ features 4 total cores which can process 8 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.9 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.9 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The Core i7-7820HQ includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics 630. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The Core i7-7820HQ has the 274th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 24.65% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Its 9,118.5 score and $378 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 24.12. This is the 149th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Perf. Physics benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Celeron N5105 | Core i7-7820HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Series | -- | Core i7 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | -- | Q1 2017 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $378 |
| Production Status | -- | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Celeron N5105
4,39412% of 36,991
Core i7-7820HQ108% better
9,118.525% of 36,991
The Core i7-7820HQ has 108% better performance than the Celeron N5105 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Celeron N5105 is ranked 428th with a score of 4,394, and the Core i7-7820HQ is ranked 274th with a score of 9,118.5.
Performance per dollar
Celeron N5105
No data available
Core i7-7820HQ
24.1220% of 121.53
The Core i7-7820HQ has 46% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
Core i7-7820HQ's 24.12 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked CPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N5105 or
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-4940MX | 9,402 | +114% |
| Xeon E3-1505M v5 | 9,332 | +112% |
| Core i7-7820HQ | 9,118.5 | +108% |
| Core i3-N305 | 8,926 | +103% |
| Core i7-7700HQ | 8,833 | +101% |
| Core i5-6260U | 4,420 | +1% |
| Core i7-6560U | 4,399 | +0% |
| Celeron N5105 | 4,394 | |
| Core i5-7300U | 4,364.5 | -1% |
| Pentium Silver N6005 | 4,341.5 | -1% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N5105 orCore i7-7820HQ
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Core i5-7440HQ | 26.33 | +9% |
| Xeon E-2176M | 26.06 | +8% |
| Core i7-11390H | 24.89 | +3% |
| Core i7-1195G7 | 24.5 | +2% |
| Core i5-7300HQ | 24.17 | +0% |
| Core i7-7820HQ | 24.12 | |
| Core i7-7700HQ | 23.37 | -3% |
| Core i5-8365U | 21.53 | -11% |
| Xeon E3-1505M v5 | 21.5 | -11% |
| Core i7-4810MQ | 21.2 | -12% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Celeron N5105 | Core i7-7820HQ |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 4,394 | 9,118.5 (+107.52%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy CPU | 1,643 | 3,897.5 (+137.22%) |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 368 | 736 (+100%) |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 108.1 | 163 (+50.79%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 1,291 | 3,598 (+178.7%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 471 | 1,198 (+154.35%) |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 4,066 | 7,163 (+76.17%) |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 1,516 | 2,120 (+39.84%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Celeron N5105 | Core i7-7820HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Foundry | -- | Intel |
| Process Size | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Celeron N5105 | Core i7-7820HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Series | -- | Core i7 |
| Microarchitecture | -- | Kaby Lake-H |
| Codename | Jasper Lake | Kaby Lake-H |
| Memory Support | -- | DDR4-2400, DDR3 |
| Memory Channels | -- | Dual-channel |
| ECC Memory | -- | No |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron N5105 | Core i7-7820HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Clock Speed | 2000.0 MHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Turbo Clock | 2900.0 MHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | -- | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | -- | 29.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | -- | No |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron N5105 | Core i7-7820HQ |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 256 KB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Celeron N5105 | Core i7-7820HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1338 | Intel BGA 1440 |
| PCI Express | -- | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 W | 45 W |
| TJ Max | 105 °C | 100 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Celeron N5105 | Core i7-7820HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
| Extensions / Technologies | -- | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, EIST, Intel 64, XD bit, TXT, VT-x, VT-d, AES-NI, TBT 2.0 |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.