Intel Celeron N4500 vs Intel Celeron N3150

VS
Performance
Celeron N4500
1,5074% of 36,991
Celeron N31501% better
1,5164% of 36,991

The Celeron N3150 has 1% better performance than the Celeron N4500 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N4500
No data available
Celeron N3150
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N4500 and the Celeron N3150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N4500
Shop Celeron N3150
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron N4500 CPU

The Intel Celeron N4500 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N4500 is compatible with FCBGA1338 motherboards and is fabricated on a 10 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N4500 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 4,096 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1.5 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N4500 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2800.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N4500 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N4500 has the 667th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.07% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron N3150 CPU

The Intel Celeron N3150 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N3150 is compatible with FCBGA1170 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N3150 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 448 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N3150 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2080.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N3150 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N3150 has the 666th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.10% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron N4500Celeron N3150
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Market SegmentMobileMobile
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron N4500
1,5074% of 36,991
Celeron N31501% better
1,5164% of 36,991

The Celeron N3150 has 1% better performance than the Celeron N4500 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron N4500 is ranked 667th with a score of 1,507, and the Celeron N3150 is ranked 666th with a score of 1,516.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N4500
No data available
Celeron N3150
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N4500 and the Celeron N3150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N4500 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Celeron 1017U1,532+2%
A4-5150M1,531+2%
A9-94251,527+1%
Celeron 2957U1,524+1%
Celeron N31501,516+1%
Celeron N45001,507
Atom x7-Z87501,499-1%
A9-94101,470-2%
A6-92201,469.5-2%
E2-38001,440-4%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N4500 orCeleron N3150
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron N4500Celeron N3150
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,507
1,516
(+0.6%)
3DMark Time Spy CPU
504
--
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
171
(+44.92%)
118
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
82
(+156.25%)
32
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
662
(+34.55%)
492
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
457
(+183.85%)
161
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,996
(+66.47%)
1,199
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,388
(+143.51%)
570
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron N4500Celeron N3150
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Process Size10 nm14 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron N4500Celeron N3150
CodenameJasper LakeBraswell

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N4500Celeron N3150
Cores24
Threads24
Clock Speed1100.0 MHz1600.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2800.0 MHz2080.0 MHz

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N4500Celeron N3150
L1 Cache4,096 KB448 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB0 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron N4500Celeron N3150
SocketFCBGA1338FCBGA1170
Thermal Design Power (TDP)6 W6 W
TJ Max105 °C90 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron N4500Celeron N3150
Integrated GraphicsIntel UHD GraphicsIntel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.