PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

Intel Celeron N4500 vs Intel Celeron 6305

Intel
VS
Intel
Performance
Celeron N4500
1,5074% of 36,991
Celeron 630528% better
1,935.55% of 36,991

The Celeron 6305 has 28% better performance than the Celeron N4500 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N4500
No data available
Celeron 6305
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N4500 and the Celeron 6305 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N4500
Shop Celeron 6305
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron N4500 CPU

The Intel Celeron N4500 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N4500 is compatible with FCBGA1338 motherboards and is fabricated on a 10 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N4500 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 4,096 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1.5 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N4500 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2800.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N4500 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N4500 has the 666th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.07% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron 6305 CPU

The Intel Celeron 6305 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 6305 is compatible with FCBGA1449 motherboards and is fabricated on a 10 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron 6305 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 160 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2.5 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron 6305 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron 6305 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron 6305 has the 618th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.23% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron N4500Celeron 6305
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Market SegmentMobileMobile
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron N4500
1,5074% of 36,991
Celeron 630528% better
1,935.55% of 36,991

The Celeron 6305 has 28% better performance than the Celeron N4500 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron N4500 is ranked 666th with a score of 1,507, and the Celeron 6305 is ranked 618th with a score of 1,935.5.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N4500
No data available
Celeron 6305
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N4500 and the Celeron 6305 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N4500 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
A6-52001,964.5+30%
Phenom II X4 N9701,940+29%
Celeron 63051,935.5+28%
Celeron N34501,925+28%
Core i3-2365M1,915+27%
Celeron 2957U1,524+1%
Celeron N31501,516+1%
Celeron N45001,507
Atom x7-Z87501,499-1%
A9-94101,470-2%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N4500 orCeleron 6305
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron N4500Celeron 6305
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,507
1,935.5
(+28.43%)
3DMark Time Spy CPU
504
--
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
171
(+6.15%)
161.1
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
82
84
(+2.44%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
662
1,236
(+86.71%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
457
744
(+62.8%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,996
2,089
(+4.66%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,388
(+15.96%)
1,197
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron N4500Celeron 6305
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Process Size10 nm10 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron N4500Celeron 6305
CodenameJasper LakeTiger Lake

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N4500Celeron 6305
Cores22
Threads22
Clock Speed1100.0 MHz1800.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2800.0 MHz--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N4500Celeron 6305
L1 Cache4,096 KB160 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB2.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron N4500Celeron 6305
SocketFCBGA1338FCBGA1449
Thermal Design Power (TDP)6 W15 W
TJ Max105 °C100 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron N4500Celeron 6305
Integrated GraphicsIntel UHD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.