Intel Celeron N4020 vs Intel Celeron N3050

VS
Performance
Celeron N402077% better
1,6504% of 36,991
Celeron N3050
9323% of 36,991

The Celeron N4020 has 77% better performance than the Celeron N3050 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N4020
No data available
Celeron N3050
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N4020 and the Celeron N3050 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N4020
Shop Celeron N3050
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron N4020 CPU

The Intel Celeron N4020 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N4020 is compatible with Socket 1090 FCBGA motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics 600 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N4020 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 1,792 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 4 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N4020 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2800.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N4020 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics 600. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N4020 has the 651st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.46% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron N3050 CPU

The Intel Celeron N3050 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N3050 is compatible with FCBGA1170 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N3050 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 112 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N3050 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2160.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N3050 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N3050 has the 704th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron N4020Celeron N3050
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Market SegmentMobileMobile
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron N402077% better
1,6504% of 36,991
Celeron N3050
9323% of 36,991

The Celeron N4020 has 77% better performance than the Celeron N3050 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron N4020 is ranked 651st with a score of 1,650, and the Celeron N3050 is ranked 704th with a score of 932.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N4020
No data available
Celeron N3050
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N4020 and the Celeron N3050 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N4020 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Celeron N29301,679+2%
A8-4555M1,654+0%
Celeron N40201,650
A4-50001,635-1%
Celeron N29401,635-1%
Celeron N2807976-41%
Celeron N2820967-41%
Celeron N3050932-44%
Celeron N2815871.5-47%
Celeron N2810858-48%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N4020 orCeleron N3050
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron N4020Celeron N3050
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,650
(+77.04%)
932
3DMark Time Spy CPU
476
--
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
127.1
(+103.36%)
62.5
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
73.8
(+117.06%)
34
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
544
(+118.47%)
249
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
343
(+133.33%)
147
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,555
(+163.11%)
591
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,151
(+106.27%)
558
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron N4020Celeron N3050
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Process Size14 nm14 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron N4020Celeron N3050
CodenameGemini LakeBraswell

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N4020Celeron N3050
Cores22
Threads22
Clock Speed1100.0 MHz1600.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2800.0 MHz2160.0 MHz

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N4020Celeron N3050
L1 Cache1,792 KB112 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
L3 Cache--0 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron N4020Celeron N3050
SocketSocket 1090 FCBGAFCBGA1170
Thermal Design Power (TDP)6 W6 W
TJ Max--90 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron N4020Celeron N3050
Integrated GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 600Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.