Intel Celeron N4020 vs AMD E-350

VS
Performance
Celeron N4020171% better
1,6504% of 36,991
E-350
6092% of 36,991

The Celeron N4020 has 171% better performance than the E-350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N4020
No data available
E-350
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N4020 and the E-350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N4020
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron N4020 CPU

The Intel Celeron N4020 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N4020 is compatible with Socket 1090 FCBGA motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics 600 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N4020 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 1,792 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 4 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N4020 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2800.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N4020 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics 600. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N4020 has the 651st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.46% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD E-350 CPU

The AMD E-350 is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2011. It is part of AMD's E lineup, which is based on the Zacate microarchitecture. The E-350 is compatible with AMD Socket FT1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 40 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6310 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The E-350 supports DDR3 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the E-350 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The E-350 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The E-350 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6310. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The E-350 has the 712th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 1.65% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron N4020E-350
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Series--E
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q1 2011
Production Status--End-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron N4020171% better
1,6504% of 36,991
E-350
6092% of 36,991

The Celeron N4020 has 171% better performance than the E-350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron N4020 is ranked 651st with a score of 1,650, and the E-350 is ranked 712th with a score of 609.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N4020
No data available
E-350
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N4020 and the E-350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N4020 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Celeron N29301,679+2%
A8-4555M1,654+0%
Celeron N40201,650
A4-50001,635-1%
Celeron N29401,635-1%
E1-6010677.5-59%
Celeron N2805637.5-61%
E-350609-63%
A4-1250607-63%
E1-1200604-63%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N4020 orE-350
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron N4020E-350
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,650
(+170.94%)
609
3DMark Time Spy CPU
476
--
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
127.1
--
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
73.8
--
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
544
(+203.91%)
179
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
343
(+226.67%)
105
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,555
(+267.61%)
423
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,151
(+134.9%)
490
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron N4020E-350
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Process Size14 nm40 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron N4020E-350
Series--E
Microarchitecture--Zacate
CodenameGemini LakeZacate
Memory Support--DDR3
Memory Channels--Single-channel
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N4020E-350
Cores22
Threads22
Clock Speed1100.0 MHz1600.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2800.0 MHz--
Base Clock--100 MHz
Multiplier--16.0x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N4020E-350
L1 Cache1,792 KB64 KB
L2 Cache4 MB512 KB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron N4020E-350
SocketSocket 1090 FCBGAAMD Socket FT1
Thermal Design Power (TDP)6 W18 W
TJ Max--90 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron N4020E-350
Integrated GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 600Radeon HD 6310
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.