The Celeron N4020 has 8% better performance than the A9-9425 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N4020 and the A9-9425 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel Celeron N4020 CPU
The Intel Celeron N4020 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N4020 is compatible with Socket 1090 FCBGA motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics 600 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Celeron N4020 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 1,792 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 4 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron N4020 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2800.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron N4020 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics 600. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron N4020 has the 651st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.46% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the AMD A9-9425 CPU
The AMD A9-9425 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2016. It is part of AMD's A9 lineup, which is based on the Stoney Ridge microarchitecture. The A9-9425 is compatible with AMD Socket FT4 motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R5 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The A9-9425 supports DDR4 memory. In terms of cache, the A9-9425 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The A9-9425 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 3.1 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.7 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The A9-9425 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R5. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The A9-9425 has the 664th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.13% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
Info | Celeron N4020 | A9-9425 |
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
Series | -- | A9 |
Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Release Date | -- | Q2 2016 |
Production Status | -- | Active |
Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron N4020 has 8% better performance than the A9-9425 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Celeron N4020 is ranked 651st with a score of 1,650, and the A9-9425 is ranked 664th with a score of 1,527.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N4020 and the A9-9425 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
---|---|---|
Celeron N2930 | 1,679 | +2% |
A8-4555M | 1,654 | +0% |
Celeron N4020 | 1,650 | |
A4-5000 | 1,635 | -1% |
Celeron N2940 | 1,635 | -1% |
Celeron 1017U | 1,532 | -7% |
A4-5150M | 1,531 | -7% |
A9-9425 | 1,527 | -7% |
Celeron 2957U | 1,524 | -8% |
Celeron N3150 | 1,516 | -8% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
---|---|---|---|
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
Benchmark | Celeron N4020 | A9-9425 |
---|---|---|
3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,650 (+8.06%) | 1,527 |
3DMark Time Spy CPU | 476 | 705 (+48.11%) |
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 127.1 (+1.68%) | 125 |
Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 73.8 | 76 (+2.98%) |
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 544 | -- |
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 343 | -- |
CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 1,555 (+3.19%) | 1,507 |
CPU Mark Single-Thread | 1,151 | 1,322 (+14.86%) |
Technical Specs
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
Spec | Celeron N4020 | A9-9425 |
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
Process Size | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Transistors | -- | 1,200 million |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
Spec | Celeron N4020 | A9-9425 |
---|---|---|
Series | -- | A9 |
Microarchitecture | -- | Stoney Ridge |
Codename | Gemini Lake | Stoney Ridge |
Memory Support | -- | DDR4 |
ECC Memory | -- | No |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
Spec | Celeron N4020 | A9-9425 |
---|---|---|
Cores | 2 | 2 |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Clock Speed | 1100.0 MHz | 3.1 GHz |
Turbo Clock | 2800.0 MHz | 3.7 GHz |
Base Clock | -- | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | -- | 31.0x |
Multiplier Unlocked | -- | No |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
Spec | Celeron N4020 | A9-9425 |
---|---|---|
L1 Cache | 1,792 KB | 128 KB |
L2 Cache | 4 MB | 1 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
Spec | Celeron N4020 | A9-9425 |
---|---|---|
Socket | Socket 1090 FCBGA | AMD Socket FT4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 W | 15 W |
Tcase Max | -- | 74 °C |
TJ Max | -- | 90 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
Spec | Celeron N4020 | A9-9425 |
---|---|---|
Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Radeon R5 |
Extensions / Technologies | -- | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD64, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, FMA3, FMA4, F16C, TBM, XOP, AMD-V, EVP, Turbo Core |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.