Intel Celeron N4020 vs AMD A9-9425

VS
Performance
Celeron N40208% better
1,6504% of 36,991
A9-9425
1,5274% of 36,991

The Celeron N4020 has 8% better performance than the A9-9425 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N4020
No data available
A9-9425
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N4020 and the A9-9425 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N4020
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron N4020 CPU

The Intel Celeron N4020 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N4020 is compatible with Socket 1090 FCBGA motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics 600 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N4020 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 1,792 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 4 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N4020 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2800.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N4020 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics 600. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N4020 has the 651st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.46% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD A9-9425 CPU

The AMD A9-9425 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2016. It is part of AMD's A9 lineup, which is based on the Stoney Ridge microarchitecture. The A9-9425 is compatible with AMD Socket FT4 motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R5 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The A9-9425 supports DDR4 memory. In terms of cache, the A9-9425 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A9-9425 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 3.1 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.7 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The A9-9425 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R5. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A9-9425 has the 664th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.13% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron N4020A9-9425
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Series--A9
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q2 2016
Production Status--Active
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron N40208% better
1,6504% of 36,991
A9-9425
1,5274% of 36,991

The Celeron N4020 has 8% better performance than the A9-9425 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron N4020 is ranked 651st with a score of 1,650, and the A9-9425 is ranked 664th with a score of 1,527.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N4020
No data available
A9-9425
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N4020 and the A9-9425 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N4020 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Celeron N29301,679+2%
A8-4555M1,654+0%
Celeron N40201,650
A4-50001,635-1%
Celeron N29401,635-1%
Celeron 1017U1,532-7%
A4-5150M1,531-7%
A9-94251,527-7%
Celeron 2957U1,524-8%
Celeron N31501,516-8%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N4020 orA9-9425
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron N4020A9-9425
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,650
(+8.06%)
1,527
3DMark Time Spy CPU
476
705
(+48.11%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
127.1
(+1.68%)
125
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
73.8
76
(+2.98%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
544
--
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
343
--
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,555
(+3.19%)
1,507
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,151
1,322
(+14.86%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron N4020A9-9425
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors--1,200 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron N4020A9-9425
Series--A9
Microarchitecture--Stoney Ridge
CodenameGemini LakeStoney Ridge
Memory Support--DDR4
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N4020A9-9425
Cores22
Threads22
Clock Speed1100.0 MHz3.1 GHz
Turbo Clock2800.0 MHz3.7 GHz
Base Clock--100 MHz
Multiplier--31.0x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N4020A9-9425
L1 Cache1,792 KB128 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron N4020A9-9425
SocketSocket 1090 FCBGAAMD Socket FT4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)6 W15 W
Tcase Max--74 °C
TJ Max--90 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron N4020A9-9425
Integrated GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 600Radeon R5
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD64, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, FMA3, FMA4, F16C, TBM, XOP, AMD-V, EVP, Turbo Core

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.