Performance
Celeron N4020
1,6504% of 36,991
A4-721014% better
1,8865% of 36,991
The A4-7210 has 14% better performance than the Celeron N4020 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Celeron N4020
No data available
A4-7210
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N4020 and the A4-7210 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Shop Celeron N4020
Shop A4-7210
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Celeron N4020 CPU
The Intel Celeron N4020 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N4020 is compatible with Socket 1090 FCBGA motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics 600 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Celeron N4020 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 1,792 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 4 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron N4020 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2800.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron N4020 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics 600. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron N4020 has the 651st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.46% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the AMD A4-7210 CPU
The AMD A4-7210 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A4-7210 is compatible with Socket FP4 (968) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R3 Graphics integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the A4-7210 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The A4-7210 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2200.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The A4-7210 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R3 Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The A4-7210 has the 624th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.10% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Celeron N4020 | A4-7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Celeron N4020
1,6504% of 36,991
A4-721014% better
1,8865% of 36,991
The A4-7210 has 14% better performance than the Celeron N4020 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Celeron N4020 is ranked 651st with a score of 1,650, and the A4-7210 is ranked 624th with a score of 1,886.
Performance per dollar
Celeron N4020
No data available
A4-7210
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N4020 and the A4-7210 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N4020 or
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Core i3-2365M | 1,915 | +16% |
| Celeron 3865U | 1,906 | +16% |
| A4-7210 | 1,886 | +14% |
| Celeron 1037U | 1,880 | +14% |
| Celeron J4005 | 1,877 | +14% |
| Celeron N2930 | 1,679 | +2% |
| A8-4555M | 1,654 | +0% |
| Celeron N4020 | 1,650 | |
| A4-5000 | 1,635 | -1% |
| Celeron N2940 | 1,635 | -1% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N4020 orA4-7210
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Celeron N4020 | A4-7210 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,650 | 1,886 (+14.3%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy CPU | 476 | -- |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 127.1 | 157 (+23.52%) |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 73.8 (+60.43%) | 46 |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 544 | 571 (+4.96%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 343 (+66.5%) | 206 |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 1,555 | 1,665 (+7.07%) |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 1,151 (+58.76%) | 725 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Celeron N4020 | A4-7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 930 million |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Celeron N4020 | A4-7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Gemini Lake | Mullins |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron N4020 | A4-7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Clock Speed | 1100.0 MHz | 1800.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 2800.0 MHz | 2200.0 MHz |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron N4020 | A4-7210 |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 1,792 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Celeron N4020 | A4-7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | Socket 1090 FCBGA | Socket FP4 (968) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 W | 25 W |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Celeron N4020 | A4-7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Radeon R3 Graphics |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.