Performance
Celeron N3350
1,3334% of 36,991
Celeron 2970M70% better
2,272.56% of 36,991
The Celeron 2970M has 70% better performance than the Celeron N3350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Celeron N3350
No data available
Celeron 2970M
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N3350 and the Celeron 2970M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Shop Celeron N3350
Shop Celeron 2970M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Celeron N3350 CPU
The Intel Celeron N3350 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N3350 is compatible with Socket 1296 FCBGA motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics 500 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Celeron N3350 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 896 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron N3350 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron N3350 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics 500. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron N3350 has the 681st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.60% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the Intel Celeron 2970M CPU
The Intel Celeron 2970M is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 2970M is compatible with FCPGA946 motherboards and is fabricated on a 22 nm manufacturing process.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Celeron 2970M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron 2970M features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2200.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron 2970M does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron 2970M has the 589th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.14% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Celeron N3350 | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Celeron N3350
1,3334% of 36,991
Celeron 2970M70% better
2,272.56% of 36,991
The Celeron 2970M has 70% better performance than the Celeron N3350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Celeron N3350 is ranked 681st with a score of 1,333, and the Celeron 2970M is ranked 589th with a score of 2,272.5.
Performance per dollar
Celeron N3350
No data available
Celeron 2970M
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N3350 and the Celeron 2970M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N3350 or
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Core M-5Y10c | 2,311 | +73% |
| PRO A12-9800B | 2,275 | +71% |
| Celeron 2970M | 2,272.5 | +70% |
| A8-3500M | 2,247 | +69% |
| A8-4500M | 2,243 | +68% |
| Atom Z3745D | 1,345 | +1% |
| A4-3305M | 1,338.5 | +0% |
| Celeron N3350 | 1,333 | |
| Atom Z3770 | 1,330 | -0% |
| Atom x5-Z8350 | 1,313 | -2% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N3350 orCeleron 2970M
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Celeron N3350 | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,333 | 2,272.5 (+70.48%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy CPU | -- | 900 |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 85 | 164 (+92.94%) |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 46 | 85 (+84.78%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 405 | -- |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 246 | -- |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 1,108 | 1,501 (+35.47%) |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 803 | 1,245 (+55.04%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Celeron N3350 | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 960 million |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Celeron N3350 | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Apollo Lake | -- |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron N3350 | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 2 |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Clock Speed | 1100.0 MHz | 2200.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 2400.0 MHz | -- |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron N3350 | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 896 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 Cache | 0 MB | 2 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Celeron N3350 | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | Socket 1296 FCBGA | FCPGA946 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 W | 37 W |
| TJ Max | 105 °C | 100 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Celeron N3350 | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 500 | -- |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.