Intel Celeron N3350 vs AMD Pro A10-8700B

VS
Performance
Celeron N3350
1,3334% of 36,991
Pro A10-8700B59% better
2,123.56% of 36,991

The Pro A10-8700B has 59% better performance than the Celeron N3350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N3350
No data available
Pro A10-8700B
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N3350 and the Pro A10-8700B for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N3350
Shop Pro A10-8700B
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron N3350 CPU

The Intel Celeron N3350 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N3350 is compatible with Socket 1296 FCBGA motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics 500 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N3350 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 896 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N3350 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N3350 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics 500. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N3350 has the 681st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.60% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD Pro A10-8700B CPU

The AMD Pro A10-8700B is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The Pro A10-8700B is compatible with Socket FP4 (968) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R6 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Pro A10-8700B has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 512 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro A10-8700B features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3200.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Pro A10-8700B includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R6 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro A10-8700B has the 604th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.74% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron N3350Pro A10-8700B
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Market SegmentMobileMobile
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron N3350
1,3334% of 36,991
Pro A10-8700B59% better
2,123.56% of 36,991

The Pro A10-8700B has 59% better performance than the Celeron N3350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron N3350 is ranked 681st with a score of 1,333, and the Pro A10-8700B is ranked 604th with a score of 2,123.5.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N3350
No data available
Pro A10-8700B
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N3350 and the Pro A10-8700B for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N3350 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
A10-8700P2,150.5+61%
Pentium B9602,139+60%
Pro A10-8700B2,123.5+59%
Core M-5Y512,122+59%
Core i3-3217U2,111.5+58%
Atom Z3745D1,345+1%
A4-3305M1,338.5+0%
Celeron N33501,333
Atom Z37701,330-0%
Atom x5-Z83501,313-2%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N3350 orPro A10-8700B
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron N3350Pro A10-8700B
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,333
2,123.5
(+59.3%)
3DMark Time Spy CPU
--
675
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
85
192
(+125.88%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
46
70
(+52.17%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
405
1,006
(+148.4%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
246
475
(+93.09%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,108
2,224
(+100.72%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
803
1,123
(+39.85%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron N3350Pro A10-8700B
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors--3,100 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron N3350Pro A10-8700B
CodenameApollo LakeCarrizo

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N3350Pro A10-8700B
Cores24
Threads24
Clock Speed1100.0 MHz1800.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2400.0 MHz3200.0 MHz

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N3350Pro A10-8700B
L1 Cache896 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache0 MB--

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron N3350Pro A10-8700B
SocketSocket 1296 FCBGASocket FP4 (968)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)6 W35 W
TJ Max105 °C--

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron N3350Pro A10-8700B
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 500Radeon R6 Series

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.