Intel Celeron N3150 vs Intel Celeron N3350

VS
Performance
Celeron N315014% better
1,5164% of 36,991
Celeron N3350
1,3334% of 36,991

The Celeron N3150 has 14% better performance than the Celeron N3350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N3150
No data available
Celeron N3350
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N3150 and the Celeron N3350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N3150
Shop Celeron N3350
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron N3150 CPU

The Intel Celeron N3150 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N3150 is compatible with FCBGA1170 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N3150 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 448 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N3150 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2080.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N3150 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N3150 has the 666th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.10% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron N3350 CPU

The Intel Celeron N3350 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N3350 is compatible with Socket 1296 FCBGA motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics 500 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N3350 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 896 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N3350 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N3350 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics 500. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N3350 has the 681st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.60% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron N3150Celeron N3350
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Market SegmentMobileMobile
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron N315014% better
1,5164% of 36,991
Celeron N3350
1,3334% of 36,991

The Celeron N3150 has 14% better performance than the Celeron N3350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron N3150 is ranked 666th with a score of 1,516, and the Celeron N3350 is ranked 681st with a score of 1,333.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N3150
No data available
Celeron N3350
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N3150 and the Celeron N3350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N3150 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
A9-94251,527+1%
Celeron 2957U1,524+1%
Celeron N31501,516
Celeron N45001,507-1%
Atom x7-Z87501,499-1%
Atom Z3745D1,345-11%
A4-3305M1,338.5-12%
Celeron N33501,333-12%
Atom Z37701,330-12%
Atom x5-Z83501,313-13%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N3150 orCeleron N3350
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron N3150Celeron N3350
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,516
(+13.73%)
1,333
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
118
(+38.82%)
85
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
32
46
(+43.75%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
492
(+21.48%)
405
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
161
246
(+52.8%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,199
(+8.21%)
1,108
CPU Mark Single-Thread
570
803
(+40.88%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron N3150Celeron N3350
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Process Size14 nm14 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron N3150Celeron N3350
CodenameBraswellApollo Lake

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N3150Celeron N3350
Cores42
Threads42
Clock Speed1600.0 MHz1100.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2080.0 MHz2400.0 MHz

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N3150Celeron N3350
L1 Cache448 KB896 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache0 MB0 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron N3150Celeron N3350
SocketFCBGA1170Socket 1296 FCBGA
Thermal Design Power (TDP)6 W6 W
TJ Max90 °C105 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron N3150Celeron N3350
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 SeriesIntel HD Graphics 500

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.