Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Core M-5Y10c

VS
Performance
Celeron N3060
9933% of 36,991
Core M-5Y10c133% better
2,3116% of 36,991

The Core M-5Y10c has 133% better performance than the Celeron N3060 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N3060
No data available
Core M-5Y10c
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N3060 and the Core M-5Y10c for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N3060
Shop Core M-5Y10c
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron N3060 CPU

The Intel Celeron N3060 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The Celeron N3060 is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N3060 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 448 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N3060 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2480.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N3060 does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N3060 has the 701st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.68% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Core M-5Y10c CPU

The Intel Core M-5Y10c is a 2-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2014. It is part of Intel's Core M lineup, which is based on the Broadwell-Y microarchitecture. The M-5Y10c is compatible with Intel BGA 1234 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD 5300 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Core M-5Y10c supports DDR4 memory. In terms of cache, the Core M-5Y10c has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Core M-5Y10c features 2 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 800.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2000.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Core M-5Y10c includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD 5300. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Core M-5Y10c has the 587th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.25% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron N3060Core M-5Y10c
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Series--Core M
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q4 2014
Production Status--Active
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron N3060
9933% of 36,991
Core M-5Y10c133% better
2,3116% of 36,991

The Core M-5Y10c has 133% better performance than the Celeron N3060 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron N3060 is ranked 701st with a score of 993, and the Core M-5Y10c is ranked 587th with a score of 2,311.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N3060
No data available
Core M-5Y10c
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N3060 and the Core M-5Y10c for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N3060 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
A8-5557M2,318+133%
Core i5-3339Y2,313+133%
Core M-5Y10c2,311+133%
PRO A12-9800B2,275+129%
Celeron 2970M2,272.5+129%
Celeron N28301,027+3%
A4-4355M994+0%
Celeron N3060993
Celeron N2807976-2%
Celeron N2820967-3%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N3060 orCore M-5Y10c
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron N3060Core M-5Y10c
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
993
2,311
(+132.73%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
72.5
164
(+126.21%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
38
66
(+73.68%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
--
1,207
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
--
623
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
658
1,901
(+188.91%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
626
1,128
(+80.19%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron N3060Core M-5Y10c
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Foundry--Intel
Process Size14 nm14 nm
Transistors--1,300 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron N3060Core M-5Y10c
Series--Core M
Microarchitecture--Broadwell-Y
Codename--Broadwell-Y
Memory Support--DDR4
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N3060Core M-5Y10c
Cores22
Threads24
Clock Speed1600.0 MHz800.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2480.0 MHz2000.0 MHz
Base Clock--100 MHz
Multiplier--8.0x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N3060Core M-5Y10c
L1 Cache448 KB64 KB
L2 Cache2 MB256 KB
L3 Cache0 MB4 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron N3060Core M-5Y10c
Socket--Intel BGA 1234
Thermal Design Power (TDP)6 W5 W
TJ Max90 °C95 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron N3060Core M-5Y10c
Integrated Graphics--Intel HD 5300
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, AVX, EIST, Intel 64, XD bit, VT-x, HTT

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.