Intel Celeron N3060 vs AMD A6-4455M

VS
Performance
Celeron N3060
9933% of 36,991
A6-4455M22% better
1,2123% of 36,991

The A6-4455M has 22% better performance than the Celeron N3060 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N3060
No data available
A6-4455M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N3060 and the A6-4455M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N3060
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron N3060 CPU

The Intel Celeron N3060 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The Celeron N3060 is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N3060 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 448 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N3060 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2480.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N3060 does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N3060 has the 701st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.68% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD A6-4455M CPU

The AMD A6-4455M is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2012. It is part of AMD's A6 lineup, which is based on the Trinity microarchitecture. The A6-4455M is compatible with AMD Socket FP2 motherboards and is fabricated on GlobalFoundries's 32 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 7500G integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The A6-4455M supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the A6-4455M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 92 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A6-4455M features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.1 GHz, and it can boost up to 2.6 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The A6-4455M includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 7500G. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A6-4455M has the 689th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.28% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron N3060A6-4455M
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Series--A6
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q2 2012
Production Status--End-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron N3060
9933% of 36,991
A6-4455M22% better
1,2123% of 36,991

The A6-4455M has 22% better performance than the Celeron N3060 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron N3060 is ranked 701st with a score of 993, and the A6-4455M is ranked 689th with a score of 1,212.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N3060
No data available
A6-4455M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N3060 and the A6-4455M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N3060 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
E2-90101,241+25%
Atom Z37401,234+24%
A6-4455M1,212+22%
Atom Z3735D1,202+21%
E2-90001,199+21%
Celeron N28301,027+3%
A4-4355M994+0%
Celeron N3060993
Celeron N2807976-2%
Celeron N2820967-3%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N3060 orA6-4455M
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron N3060A6-4455M
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
993
1,212
(+22.05%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
72.5
--
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
38
--
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
--
302
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
--
228
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
658
793
(+20.52%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
626
786
(+25.56%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron N3060A6-4455M
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Foundry--GlobalFoundries
Process Size14 nm32 nm
Transistors--1,303 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron N3060A6-4455M
Series--A6
Microarchitecture--Trinity
Codename--Trinity
Memory Support--DDR3
Memory Channels--Dual-channel
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N3060A6-4455M
Cores22
Threads22
Clock Speed1600.0 MHz2.1 GHz
Turbo Clock2480.0 MHz2.6 GHz
Base Clock--100 MHz
Multiplier--21.0x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N3060A6-4455M
L1 Cache448 KB92 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache0 MB--

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron N3060A6-4455M
Socket--AMD Socket FP2
PCI Express--PCIe 2.0
Thermal Design Power (TDP)6 W17 W
Tcase Max--100 °C
TJ Max90 °C--

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron N3060A6-4455M
Integrated Graphics--Radeon HD 7500G
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, FMA3, F16C, XOP, ABM, TBM, Turbo Core

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.