Performance
Celeron N3050
9323% of 36,991
Core m3-8100Y177% better
2,579.57% of 36,991
The Core m3-8100Y has 177% better performance than the Celeron N3050 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Celeron N3050
No data available
Core m3-8100Y
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N3050 and the Core m3-8100Y for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Shop Celeron N3050
Shop Core m3-8100Y
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Celeron N3050 CPU
The Intel Celeron N3050 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N3050 is compatible with FCBGA1170 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Celeron N3050 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 112 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron N3050 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2160.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron N3050 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron N3050 has the 704th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the Intel Core m3-8100Y CPU
The Intel Core m3-8100Y is a 2-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The m3-8100Y is compatible with FCBGA1515 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Core m3-8100Y has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Core m3-8100Y features 2 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Core m3-8100Y does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.
Benchmark Performance
The Core m3-8100Y has the 562nd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.97% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Celeron N3050 | Core m3-8100Y |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Celeron N3050
9323% of 36,991
Core m3-8100Y177% better
2,579.57% of 36,991
The Core m3-8100Y has 177% better performance than the Celeron N3050 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Celeron N3050 is ranked 704th with a score of 932, and the Core m3-8100Y is ranked 562nd with a score of 2,579.5.
Performance per dollar
Celeron N3050
No data available
Core m3-8100Y
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N3050 and the Core m3-8100Y for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N3050 or
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Core i5-460M | 2,587 | +178% |
| Core i5-4302Y | 2,583 | +177% |
| Core m3-8100Y | 2,579.5 | +177% |
| Core i3-4030U | 2,558 | +174% |
| Core m5-6Y54 | 2,529 | +171% |
| Celeron N2807 | 976 | +5% |
| Celeron N2820 | 967 | +4% |
| Celeron N3050 | 932 | |
| Celeron N2815 | 871.5 | -6% |
| Celeron N2810 | 858 | -8% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N3050 orCore m3-8100Y
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Celeron N3050 | Core m3-8100Y |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 932 | 2,579.5 (+176.77%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy CPU | -- | 992 |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 62.5 | 179.5 (+187.2%) |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 34 | 96.6 (+184.12%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 249 | -- |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 147 | -- |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 591 | 2,881 (+387.48%) |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 558 | 1,742 (+212.19%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Celeron N3050 | Core m3-8100Y |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Celeron N3050 | Core m3-8100Y |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Braswell | -- |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron N3050 | Core m3-8100Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 2 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Clock Speed | 1600.0 MHz | 1100.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 2160.0 MHz | 3400.0 MHz |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron N3050 | Core m3-8100Y |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 Cache | 0 MB | 4 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Celeron N3050 | Core m3-8100Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | FCBGA1515 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W |
| TJ Max | 90 °C | 100 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Celeron N3050 | Core m3-8100Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series | -- |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.