Intel Celeron N3050 vs Intel Celeron N4120

VS
Performance
Celeron N3050
9323% of 36,991
Celeron N4120186% better
2,668.57% of 36,991

The Celeron N4120 has 186% better performance than the Celeron N3050 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N3050
No data available
Celeron N4120
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N3050 and the Celeron N4120 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N3050
Shop Celeron N4120
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron N3050 CPU

The Intel Celeron N3050 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N3050 is compatible with FCBGA1170 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N3050 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 112 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N3050 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2160.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N3050 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N3050 has the 704th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron N4120 CPU

The Intel Celeron N4120 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N4120 is compatible with FCBGA1090 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics 600 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N4120 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 1,792 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 4 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N4120 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2600.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N4120 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics 600. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N4120 has the 552nd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 7.21% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron N3050Celeron N4120
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Market SegmentMobileMobile
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron N3050
9323% of 36,991
Celeron N4120186% better
2,668.57% of 36,991

The Celeron N4120 has 186% better performance than the Celeron N3050 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron N3050 is ranked 704th with a score of 932, and the Celeron N4120 is ranked 552nd with a score of 2,668.5.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N3050
No data available
Celeron N4120
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N3050 and the Celeron N4120 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N3050 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core m5-6Y572,681+188%
Core m7-6Y752,678.5+187%
Celeron N41202,668.5+186%
Core i5-2467M2,666.5+186%
A10-5750M2,658+185%
Celeron N2807976+5%
Celeron N2820967+4%
Celeron N3050932
Celeron N2815871.5-6%
Celeron N2810858-8%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N3050 orCeleron N4120
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron N3050Celeron N4120
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
932
2,668.5
(+186.32%)
3DMark Time Spy CPU
--
938.5
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
62.5
224
(+258.4%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
34
73.2
(+115.29%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
249
806
(+223.69%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
147
324
(+120.41%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
591
2,525
(+327.24%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
558
1,096
(+96.42%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron N3050Celeron N4120
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Process Size14 nm14 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron N3050Celeron N4120
CodenameBraswellGemini Lake Refresh

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N3050Celeron N4120
Cores24
Threads24
Clock Speed1600.0 MHz1100.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2160.0 MHz2600.0 MHz

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N3050Celeron N4120
L1 Cache112 KB1,792 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
L3 Cache0 MB--

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron N3050Celeron N4120
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1090
Thermal Design Power (TDP)6 W6 W
TJ Max90 °C105 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron N3050Celeron N4120
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 SeriesIntel UHD Graphics 600

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.