Performance
Celeron N3050
9323% of 36,991
Atom x7-Z870027% better
1,1863% of 36,991
The Atom x7-Z8700 has 27% better performance than the Celeron N3050 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Celeron N3050
No data available
Atom x7-Z8700
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N3050 and the Atom x7-Z8700 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Shop Celeron N3050
Shop Atom x7-Z8700
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Celeron N3050 CPU
The Intel Celeron N3050 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N3050 is compatible with FCBGA1170 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Celeron N3050 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 112 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron N3050 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2160.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron N3050 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron N3050 has the 704th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the Intel Atom x7-Z8700 CPU
The Intel Atom x7-Z8700 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The x7-Z8700 is compatible with UTFCBGA1380 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Atom x7-Z8700 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 448 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Atom x7-Z8700 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Atom x7-Z8700 does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.
Benchmark Performance
The Atom x7-Z8700 has the 693rd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.21% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Celeron N3050 | Atom x7-Z8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Celeron N3050
9323% of 36,991
Atom x7-Z870027% better
1,1863% of 36,991
The Atom x7-Z8700 has 27% better performance than the Celeron N3050 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Celeron N3050 is ranked 704th with a score of 932, and the Atom x7-Z8700 is ranked 693rd with a score of 1,186.
Performance per dollar
Celeron N3050
No data available
Atom x7-Z8700
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N3050 and the Atom x7-Z8700 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N3050 or
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| E2-9000 | 1,199 | +29% |
| A6-1450 | 1,193.5 | +28% |
| Atom x7-Z8700 | 1,186 | +27% |
| Atom Z3736F | 1,144 | +23% |
| Pentium 2129Y | 1,138 | +22% |
| Celeron N2807 | 976 | +5% |
| Celeron N2820 | 967 | +4% |
| Celeron N3050 | 932 | |
| Celeron N2815 | 871.5 | -6% |
| Celeron N2810 | 858 | -8% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N3050 orAtom x7-Z8700
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Celeron N3050 | Atom x7-Z8700 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 932 | 1,186 (+27.25%) |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 62.5 | 116 (+85.6%) |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 34 | 37.5 (+10.29%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 249 | 500 (+100.8%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 147 | 177 (+20.41%) |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 591 | 1,334 (+125.72%) |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 558 | 651 (+16.67%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Celeron N3050 | Atom x7-Z8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Celeron N3050 | Atom x7-Z8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Braswell | Cherry Trail |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron N3050 | Atom x7-Z8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Clock Speed | 1600.0 MHz | 1600.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 2160.0 MHz | 2400.0 MHz |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron N3050 | Atom x7-Z8700 |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 0 MB | 0 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Celeron N3050 | Atom x7-Z8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | UTFCBGA1380 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 W | 4 W |
| TJ Max | 90 °C | 90 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Celeron N3050 | Atom x7-Z8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series | -- |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.