Intel Celeron N3050 vs AMD PRO A12-9800B

VS
Performance
Celeron N3050
9323% of 36,991
PRO A12-9800B144% better
2,2756% of 36,991

The PRO A12-9800B has 144% better performance than the Celeron N3050 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N3050
No data available
PRO A12-9800B
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N3050 and the PRO A12-9800B for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N3050
Shop PRO A12-9800B
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron N3050 CPU

The Intel Celeron N3050 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N3050 is compatible with FCBGA1170 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N3050 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 112 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N3050 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2160.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N3050 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N3050 has the 704th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD PRO A12-9800B CPU

The AMD PRO A12-9800B is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The PRO A12-9800B is compatible with BGA (FP4) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R7 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the PRO A12-9800B has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 512 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The PRO A12-9800B features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2700.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3600.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The PRO A12-9800B includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R7 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The PRO A12-9800B has the 588th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.15% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron N3050PRO A12-9800B
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Market SegmentMobileMobile
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron N3050
9323% of 36,991
PRO A12-9800B144% better
2,2756% of 36,991

The PRO A12-9800B has 144% better performance than the Celeron N3050 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron N3050 is ranked 704th with a score of 932, and the PRO A12-9800B is ranked 588th with a score of 2,275.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N3050
No data available
PRO A12-9800B
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N3050 and the PRO A12-9800B for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N3050 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core i5-3339Y2,313+148%
Core M-5Y10c2,311+148%
PRO A12-9800B2,275+144%
Celeron 2970M2,272.5+144%
A8-3500M2,247+141%
Celeron N2807976+5%
Celeron N2820967+4%
Celeron N3050932
Celeron N2815871.5-6%
Celeron N2810858-8%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N3050 orPRO A12-9800B
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron N3050PRO A12-9800B
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
932
2,275
(+144.1%)
3DMark Time Spy CPU
--
439
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
62.5
225
(+260%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
34
75
(+120.59%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
249
1,200
(+381.93%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
147
544
(+270.07%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
591
2,691
(+355.33%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
558
1,392
(+149.46%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron N3050PRO A12-9800B
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors--3,100 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron N3050PRO A12-9800B
CodenameBraswellBristol Ridge PRO

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N3050PRO A12-9800B
Cores24
Threads24
Clock Speed1600.0 MHz2700.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2160.0 MHz3600.0 MHz

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N3050PRO A12-9800B
L1 Cache112 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache0 MB--

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron N3050PRO A12-9800B
SocketFCBGA1170BGA (FP4)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)6 W15 W
TJ Max90 °C90 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron N3050PRO A12-9800B
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 SeriesRadeon R7 Series

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.