Performance
Celeron N292032% better
1,5824% of 36,991
E2-9000
1,1993% of 36,991
The Celeron N2920 has 32% better performance than the E2-9000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Celeron N2920
No data available
E2-9000
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N2920 and the E2-9000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Shop Celeron N2920
Shop E2-9000
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Celeron N2920 CPU
The Intel Celeron N2920 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2013. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Bay Trail microarchitecture. The N2920 is compatible with Intel BGA 1170 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The Celeron N2920 supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron N2920 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron N2920 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1860.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2000.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron N2920 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron N2920 has the 659th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.28% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the AMD E2-9000 CPU
The AMD E2-9000 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The E2-9000 is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the E2-9000 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The E2-9000 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2200.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The E2-9000 does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.
Benchmark Performance
The E2-9000 has the 691st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.24% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Celeron N2920 | E2-9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Celeron | -- |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q4 2013 | -- |
| Production Status | Active | -- |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Celeron N292032% better
1,5824% of 36,991
E2-9000
1,1993% of 36,991
The Celeron N2920 has 32% better performance than the E2-9000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Celeron N2920 is ranked 659th with a score of 1,582, and the E2-9000 is ranked 691st with a score of 1,199.
Performance per dollar
Celeron N2920
No data available
E2-9000
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N2920 and the E2-9000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N2920 or
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Celeron 2955U | 1,604 | +1% |
| A4-6210 | 1,587.5 | +0% |
| Celeron N2920 | 1,582 | |
| A6-9225 | 1,568 | -1% |
| Phenom II X4 P960 | 1,542 | -3% |
| A6-4455M | 1,212 | -23% |
| Atom Z3735D | 1,202 | -24% |
| E2-9000 | 1,199 | -24% |
| A6-1450 | 1,193.5 | -25% |
| Atom x7-Z8700 | 1,186 | -25% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N2920 orE2-9000
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Celeron N2920 | E2-9000 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,582 (+31.94%) | 1,199 |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 118.5 (+41.07%) | 84 |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 32.5 | 47 (+44.62%) |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 950 (+0.53%) | 945 |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 552 | 799 (+44.75%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Celeron N2920 | E2-9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Foundry | Intel | -- |
| Process Size | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 1,200 million |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Celeron N2920 | E2-9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Series | Celeron | -- |
| Microarchitecture | Bay Trail | -- |
| Codename | Bay Trail-M | -- |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | -- |
| ECC Memory | No | -- |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron N2920 | E2-9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Clock Speed | 1860.0 MHz | 1800.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 2000.0 MHz | 2200.0 MHz |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | -- |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron N2920 | E2-9000 |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 56 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Celeron N2920 | E2-9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | Intel BGA 1170 | -- |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 W | 10 W |
| TJ Max | 105 °C | 90 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Celeron N2920 | E2-9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics | -- |
| Extensions / Technologies | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EIST, XD bit, BPT, NX | -- |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.