Intel Celeron N2920 vs AMD A6-7310

VS
Performance
Celeron N2920
1,5824% of 36,991
A6-731017% better
1,8495% of 36,991

The A6-7310 has 17% better performance than the Celeron N2920 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N2920
No data available
A6-7310
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N2920 and the A6-7310 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N2920
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron N2920 CPU

The Intel Celeron N2920 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2013. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Bay Trail microarchitecture. The N2920 is compatible with Intel BGA 1170 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron N2920 supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron N2920 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N2920 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1860.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2000.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N2920 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N2920 has the 659th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.28% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD A6-7310 CPU

The AMD A6-7310 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A6-7310 is compatible with Socket FP4 motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R4 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the A6-7310 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A6-7310 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2000.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The A6-7310 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R4 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A6-7310 has the 629th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.00% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron N2920A6-7310
ManufacturerIntelAMD
SeriesCeleron--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ4 2013--
Production StatusActive--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron N2920
1,5824% of 36,991
A6-731017% better
1,8495% of 36,991

The A6-7310 has 17% better performance than the Celeron N2920 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron N2920 is ranked 659th with a score of 1,582, and the A6-7310 is ranked 629th with a score of 1,849.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N2920
No data available
A6-7310
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N2920 and the A6-7310 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N2920 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Pentium N35301,875+19%
A8-64101,867+18%
A6-73101,849+17%
A8-74101,835+16%
A6-63101,825+15%
Celeron 2955U1,604+1%
A4-62101,587.5+0%
Celeron N29201,582
A6-92251,568-1%
Phenom II X4 P9601,542-3%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N2920 orA6-7310
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron N2920A6-7310
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,582
1,849
(+16.88%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
118.5
139
(+17.3%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
32.5
44.5
(+36.92%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
--
603
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
--
227
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
950
1,719
(+80.95%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
552
775
(+40.4%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron N2920A6-7310
ManufacturerIntelAMD
FoundryIntel--
Process Size22 nm28 nm
Transistors--930 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron N2920A6-7310
SeriesCeleron--
MicroarchitectureBay Trail--
CodenameBay Trail-MMullins
Memory SupportDDR3--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N2920A6-7310
Cores44
Threads44
Clock Speed1860.0 MHz2000.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2000.0 MHz2400.0 MHz
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N2920A6-7310
L1 Cache56 KB256 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron N2920A6-7310
SocketIntel BGA 1170Socket FP4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)7 W25 W
TJ Max105 °C90 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron N2920A6-7310
Integrated GraphicsHD GraphicsRadeon R4 Series
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EIST, XD bit, BPT, NX--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.