Intel Celeron N2840 vs AMD E2-9000
The E2-9000 has 12% better performance than the Celeron N2840 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N2840 and the E2-9000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel Celeron N2840 CPU
The Intel Celeron N2840 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2014. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Bay Trail microarchitecture. The N2840 is compatible with Intel BGA 1170 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The Celeron N2840 supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron N2840 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron N2840 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.2 GHz, and it can boost up to 2.6 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron N2840 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron N2840 has the 697th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.90% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the AMD E2-9000 CPU
The AMD E2-9000 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The E2-9000 is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the E2-9000 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The E2-9000 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2200.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The E2-9000 does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.
Benchmark Performance
The E2-9000 has the 690th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.24% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Celeron N2840 | E2-9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Celeron | -- |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2014 | -- |
| Production Status | Active | -- |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
The E2-9000 has 12% better performance than the Celeron N2840 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Celeron N2840 is ranked 697th with a score of 1,072.5, and the E2-9000 is ranked 690th with a score of 1,199.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N2840 and the E2-9000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| A6-4455M | 1,212 | +13% |
| Atom Z3735D | 1,202 | +12% |
| E2-9000 | 1,199 | +12% |
| A6-1450 | 1,193.5 | +11% |
| Atom x7-Z8700 | 1,186 | +11% |
| A6 Pro-7050B | 1,133 | +6% |
| Atom x5-Z8300 | 1,123.5 | +5% |
| Celeron N2840 | 1,072.5 | |
| Celeron N2830 | 1,027 | -4% |
| A4-4355M | 994 | -7% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Celeron N2840 | E2-9000 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,072.5 | 1,199 (+11.79%) |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 76 | 84 (+10.53%) |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 38 | 47 (+23.68%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 296 | -- |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 178 | -- |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 587 | 945 (+60.99%) |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 671 | 799 (+19.08%) |
Technical Specs
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Celeron N2840 | E2-9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Foundry | Intel | -- |
| Process Size | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 1,200 million |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Celeron N2840 | E2-9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Series | Celeron | -- |
| Microarchitecture | Bay Trail | -- |
| Codename | Bay Trail-M | -- |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | -- |
| ECC Memory | No | -- |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron N2840 | E2-9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 2 |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz | 1800.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2200.0 MHz |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | -- |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron N2840 | E2-9000 |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 56 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Celeron N2840 | E2-9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | Intel BGA 1170 | -- |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 W | 10 W |
| TJ Max | 105 °C | 90 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Celeron N2840 | E2-9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics | -- |
| Extensions / Technologies | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EIST, XD bit, BPT, NX | -- |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.