Intel Celeron N2840 vs AMD A4-6210

VS
Performance
Celeron N2840
1,072.53% of 36,991
A4-621048% better
1,587.54% of 36,991

The A4-6210 has 48% better performance than the Celeron N2840 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N2840
No data available
A4-6210
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N2840 and the A4-6210 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N2840
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron N2840 CPU

The Intel Celeron N2840 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2014. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Bay Trail microarchitecture. The N2840 is compatible with Intel BGA 1170 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron N2840 supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron N2840 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N2840 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.2 GHz, and it can boost up to 2.6 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N2840 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N2840 has the 698th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.90% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD A4-6210 CPU

The AMD A4-6210 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A4-6210 is compatible with Socket FT3 (BGA769) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R3 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the A4-6210 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A4-6210 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The A4-6210 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R3 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A4-6210 has the 658th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.29% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron N2840A4-6210
ManufacturerIntelAMD
SeriesCeleron--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2014--
Production StatusActive--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron N2840
1,072.53% of 36,991
A4-621048% better
1,587.54% of 36,991

The A4-6210 has 48% better performance than the Celeron N2840 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron N2840 is ranked 698th with a score of 1,072.5, and the A4-6210 is ranked 658th with a score of 1,587.5.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N2840
No data available
A4-6210
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N2840 and the A4-6210 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N2840 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Pentium N35101,619+51%
Celeron 2955U1,604+50%
A4-62101,587.5+48%
Celeron N29201,582+48%
A6-92251,568+46%
A6 Pro-7050B1,133+6%
Atom x5-Z83001,123.5+5%
Celeron N28401,072.5
Celeron N28301,027-4%
A4-4355M994-7%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N2840 orA4-6210
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron N2840A4-6210
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,072.5
1,587.5
(+48.02%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
76
134.5
(+76.97%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
38
(+1.33%)
37.5
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
297
514
(+73.06%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
178
187
(+5.06%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
587
1,494
(+154.51%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
671
(+9.82%)
611
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron N2840A4-6210
ManufacturerIntelAMD
FoundryIntel--
Process Size22 nm28 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron N2840A4-6210
SeriesCeleron--
MicroarchitectureBay Trail--
CodenameBay Trail-MMullins
Memory SupportDDR3--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N2840A4-6210
Cores24
Threads24
Clock Speed2.2 GHz1800.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2.6 GHz--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N2840A4-6210
L1 Cache56 KB256 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron N2840A4-6210
SocketIntel BGA 1170Socket FT3 (BGA769)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)7 W15 W
TJ Max105 °C--

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron N2840A4-6210
Integrated GraphicsHD GraphicsRadeon R3 Series
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EIST, XD bit, BPT, NX--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.