Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Atom x7-Z8700

VS
Performance
Celeron N2820
9673% of 36,991
Atom x7-Z870023% better
1,1863% of 36,991

The Atom x7-Z8700 has 23% better performance than the Celeron N2820 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N2820
No data available
Atom x7-Z8700
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N2820 and the Atom x7-Z8700 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N2820
Shop Atom x7-Z8700
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron N2820 CPU

The Intel Celeron N2820 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2013. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Bay Trail microarchitecture. The N2820 is compatible with Intel BGA 1170 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron N2820 supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron N2820 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N2820 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.2 GHz, and it can boost up to 2.4 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N2820 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N2820 has the 703rd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.61% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Atom x7-Z8700 CPU

The Intel Atom x7-Z8700 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The x7-Z8700 is compatible with UTFCBGA1380 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Atom x7-Z8700 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 448 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Atom x7-Z8700 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Atom x7-Z8700 does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Atom x7-Z8700 has the 693rd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.21% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron N2820Atom x7-Z8700
ManufacturerIntelIntel
SeriesCeleron--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ4 2013--
Production StatusActive--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron N2820
9673% of 36,991
Atom x7-Z870023% better
1,1863% of 36,991

The Atom x7-Z8700 has 23% better performance than the Celeron N2820 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron N2820 is ranked 703rd with a score of 967, and the Atom x7-Z8700 is ranked 693rd with a score of 1,186.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N2820
No data available
Atom x7-Z8700
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N2820 and the Atom x7-Z8700 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N2820 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
E2-90001,199+24%
A6-14501,193.5+23%
Atom x7-Z87001,186+23%
Atom Z3736F1,144+18%
Pentium 2129Y1,138+18%
Celeron N3060993+3%
Celeron N2807976+1%
Celeron N2820967
Celeron N3050932-4%
Celeron N2815871.5-10%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N2820 orAtom x7-Z8700
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron N2820Atom x7-Z8700
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
967
1,186
(+22.65%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
58
116
(+100%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
37.9
(+1.07%)
37.5
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
--
500
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
--
177
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
502
1,334
(+165.74%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
602
651
(+8.14%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron N2820Atom x7-Z8700
ManufacturerIntelIntel
FoundryIntel--
Process Size22 nm14 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron N2820Atom x7-Z8700
SeriesCeleron--
MicroarchitectureBay Trail--
CodenameBay Trail-MCherry Trail
Memory SupportDDR3--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N2820Atom x7-Z8700
Cores24
Threads24
Clock Speed2.2 GHz1600.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2.4 GHz2400.0 MHz
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N2820Atom x7-Z8700
L1 Cache56 KB448 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB
L3 Cache--0 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron N2820Atom x7-Z8700
SocketIntel BGA 1170UTFCBGA1380
Thermal Design Power (TDP)7 W4 W
TJ Max105 °C90 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron N2820Atom x7-Z8700
Integrated GraphicsHD Graphics--
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EIST, XD bit, BPT, NX--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.