Intel Celeron N2815 vs Intel Atom Z3795

VS
Performance
Celeron N2815
871.52% of 36,991
Atom Z379549% better
1,3014% of 36,991

The Atom Z3795 has 49% better performance than the Celeron N2815 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N2815
No data available
Atom Z3795
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N2815 and the Atom Z3795 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N2815
Shop Atom Z3795
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron N2815 CPU

The Intel Celeron N2815 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N2815 is compatible with FCBGA1170 motherboards and is fabricated on a 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N2815 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 112 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N2815 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1860.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2133.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N2815 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N2815 has the 705th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.36% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Atom Z3795 CPU

The Intel Atom Z3795 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The Z3795 is compatible with UTFCBGA1380 motherboards and is fabricated on a 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Atom Z3795 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 224 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Atom Z3795 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1590.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2390.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Atom Z3795 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Atom Z3795 has the 684th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron N2815Atom Z3795
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Market SegmentMobileMobile
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron N2815
871.52% of 36,991
Atom Z379549% better
1,3014% of 36,991

The Atom Z3795 has 49% better performance than the Celeron N2815 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron N2815 is ranked 705th with a score of 871.5, and the Atom Z3795 is ranked 684th with a score of 1,301.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N2815
No data available
Atom Z3795
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N2815 and the Atom Z3795 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N2815 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Atom Z37701,330+53%
Atom x5-Z83501,313+51%
Atom Z37951,301+49%
Atom Z3740D1,266.5+45%
Atom Z37451,261+45%
Celeron N2820967+11%
Celeron N3050932+7%
Celeron N2815871.5
Celeron N2810858-2%
E1-2500717.5-18%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N2815 orAtom Z3795
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron N2815Atom Z3795
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
871.5
1,301
(+49.28%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
55.5
131
(+136.04%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
32.5
37
(+13.85%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
248
474
(+91.13%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
149
179
(+20.13%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
495
1,188
(+140%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
560
640
(+14.29%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron N2815Atom Z3795
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Process Size22 nm22 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron N2815Atom Z3795
CodenameBay TrailBay Trail

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N2815Atom Z3795
Cores24
Threads24
Clock Speed1860.0 MHz1590.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2133.0 MHz2390.0 MHz

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N2815Atom Z3795
L1 Cache112 KB224 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache0 MB0 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron N2815Atom Z3795
SocketFCBGA1170UTFCBGA1380
Thermal Design Power (TDP)7.5 W4 W
TJ Max105 °C--

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron N2815Atom Z3795
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.