Performance
Celeron N2810
8582% of 36,991
Core i3-N305940% better
8,92624% of 36,991
The Core i3-N305 has 940% better performance than the Celeron N2810 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Celeron N2810
No data available
Core i3-N305
28.8924% of 121.53
The Core i3-N305 has 24% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark: Intel Core i5-13400F.
Shop Celeron N2810
Shop Core i3-N305
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Celeron N2810 CPU
The Intel Celeron N2810 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q3 2013. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Bay Trail microarchitecture. The N2810 is compatible with Intel BGA 1170 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The Celeron N2810 supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron N2810 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron N2810 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2000.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron N2810 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron N2810 has the 706th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.32% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the Intel Core i3-N305 CPU
The Intel Core i3-N305 is a 8-core (8-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2023 with a suggested retail price of $309. It is part of Intel's Core i3 lineup, which is based on the Alder Lake-N microarchitecture. The i3-N305 is compatible with Intel BGA 1264 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm manufacturing process. It features the UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The Core i3-N305 supports DDR4-3200, DDR5 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Core i3-N305 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 96 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 6 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Core i3-N305 features 8 total cores which can process 8 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3.8 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The Core i3-N305 includes an integrated graphics solution called UHD Graphics 770. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The Core i3-N305 has the 280th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 24.13% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Its 8,926 score and $309 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 28.89. This is the 124th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Perf. Physics benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Celeron N2810 | Core i3-N305 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Celeron | Core i3 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q3 2013 | Q1 2023 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $309 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Celeron N2810
8582% of 36,991
Core i3-N305940% better
8,92624% of 36,991
The Core i3-N305 has 940% better performance than the Celeron N2810 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Celeron N2810 is ranked 706th with a score of 858, and the Core i3-N305 is ranked 280th with a score of 8,926.
Performance per dollar
Celeron N2810
No data available
Core i3-N305
28.8924% of 121.53
The Core i3-N305 has 55% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
Core i3-N305's 28.89 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked CPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N2810 or
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Xeon E3-1505M v5 | 9,332 | +988% |
| Core i7-7820HQ | 9,118.5 | +963% |
| Core i3-N305 | 8,926 | +940% |
| Core i7-7700HQ | 8,833 | +929% |
| Core i7-4930MX | 8,727.5 | +917% |
| Celeron N3050 | 932 | +9% |
| Celeron N2815 | 871.5 | +2% |
| Celeron N2810 | 858 | |
| E1-2500 | 717.5 | -16% |
| E-450 | 703 | -18% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N2810 orCore i3-N305
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-1370P | 37.17 | +29% |
| Core i7-10875H | 36.94 | +28% |
| Core i5-11300H | 34.08 | +18% |
| Core i5-1135G7 | 30.6 | +6% |
| Core i5-1038NG7 | 29.38 | +2% |
| Core i3-N305 | 28.89 | |
| Core i7-1365U | 28.34 | -2% |
| Core i7-1355U | 28.03 | -3% |
| Xeon E-2276M | 27.93 | -3% |
| Core i7-11370H | 27.51 | -5% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Celeron N2810 | Core i3-N305 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 858 | 8,926 (+940.33%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy CPU | -- | 3,493 |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 59 | 829 (+1,305.08%) |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 31 | 164.7 (+431.29%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | -- | 4,727 |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | -- | 1,318 |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 420 | 10,095 (+2,303.57%) |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 512 | 2,227 (+334.96%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Celeron N2810 | Core i3-N305 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Process Size | 22 nm | 10 nm |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Celeron N2810 | Core i3-N305 |
|---|---|---|
| Series | Celeron | Core i3 |
| Microarchitecture | Bay Trail | Alder Lake-N |
| Codename | Bay Trail-M | Gracemont |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR4-3200, DDR5 |
| Memory Channels | -- | Single-channel |
| ECC Memory | No | No |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron N2810 | Core i3-N305 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Clock Speed | 2000.0 MHz | 100.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | -- | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | -- | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | -- | 1.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron N2810 | Core i3-N305 |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 56 KB | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | -- | 6 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Celeron N2810 | Core i3-N305 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | Intel BGA 1170 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| PCI Express | -- | PCIe 3.0 x9 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 W | 15 W |
| TJ Max | -- | 105 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Celeron N2810 | Core i3-N305 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Extensions / Technologies | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EIST, XD bit, BPT, NX | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, AVX-VNNI, AES-NI, EIST, Intel 64, CLMUL, RDRAND, SHA, TXT, SGX, VT-d, VT-x, TBT 2.0 |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.