Intel Celeron N2810 vs AMD A10 Pro-7350B

VS
Performance
Celeron N2810
8582% of 36,991
A10 Pro-7350B141% better
2,0666% of 36,991

The A10 Pro-7350B has 141% better performance than the Celeron N2810 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N2810
No data available
A10 Pro-7350B
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N2810 and the A10 Pro-7350B for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N2810
Shop A10 Pro-7350B
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron N2810 CPU

The Intel Celeron N2810 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q3 2013. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Bay Trail microarchitecture. The N2810 is compatible with Intel BGA 1170 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron N2810 supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron N2810 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N2810 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2000.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N2810 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N2810 has the 706th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.32% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD A10 Pro-7350B CPU

The AMD A10 Pro-7350B is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A10 Pro-7350B is compatible with Socket FP3 (906) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R6 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the A10 Pro-7350B has a L2 cache of 4 MB in size which provides fast access to instructions and data.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A10 Pro-7350B features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3300.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The A10 Pro-7350B includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R6 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A10 Pro-7350B has the 610th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.59% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron N2810A10 Pro-7350B
ManufacturerIntelAMD
SeriesCeleron--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ3 2013--
Production StatusActive--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron N2810
8582% of 36,991
A10 Pro-7350B141% better
2,0666% of 36,991

The A10 Pro-7350B has 141% better performance than the Celeron N2810 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron N2810 is ranked 706th with a score of 858, and the A10 Pro-7350B is ranked 610th with a score of 2,066.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N2810
No data available
A10 Pro-7350B
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N2810 and the A10 Pro-7350B for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N2810 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Pentium N42002,087+143%
PRO A8-9600B2,081+143%
A10 Pro-7350B2,066+141%
Core i3-4020Y2,061+140%
Core i5-4210Y2,047+139%
Celeron N3050932+9%
Celeron N2815871.5+2%
Celeron N2810858
E1-2500717.5-16%
E-450703-18%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N2810 orA10 Pro-7350B
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron N2810A10 Pro-7350B
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
858
2,066
(+140.79%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
59
162
(+174.58%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
31
55
(+77.42%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
--
658
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
--
281
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
420
1,921
(+357.38%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
512
921
(+79.88%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron N2810A10 Pro-7350B
ManufacturerIntelAMD
FoundryIntel--
Process Size22 nm28 nm
Transistors--2,410 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron N2810A10 Pro-7350B
SeriesCeleron--
MicroarchitectureBay Trail--
CodenameBay Trail-MBald Eagle
Memory SupportDDR3--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N2810A10 Pro-7350B
Cores24
Threads24
Clock Speed2000.0 MHz2100.0 MHz
Turbo Clock--3300.0 MHz
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N2810A10 Pro-7350B
L1 Cache56 KB--
L2 Cache512 KB4 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron N2810A10 Pro-7350B
SocketIntel BGA 1170Socket FP3 (906)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)7 W19 W

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron N2810A10 Pro-7350B
Integrated GraphicsHD GraphicsRadeon R6 Series
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EIST, XD bit, BPT, NX--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.