Intel Celeron N2807 vs AMD A8-6410

VS
Performance
Celeron N2807
9763% of 36,991
A8-641091% better
1,8675% of 36,991

The A8-6410 has 91% better performance than the Celeron N2807 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N2807
No data available
A8-6410
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N2807 and the A8-6410 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N2807
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron N2807 CPU

The Intel Celeron N2807 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2014. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Bay Trail microarchitecture. The N2807 is compatible with Intel BGA 1170 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron N2807 supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron N2807 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N2807 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1580.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2.2 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N2807 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N2807 has the 702nd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.64% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD A8-6410 CPU

The AMD A8-6410 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A8-6410 is compatible with BGA769 (FT3b) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R5 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the A8-6410 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A8-6410 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2000.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The A8-6410 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R5 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A8-6410 has the 628th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.05% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron N2807A8-6410
ManufacturerIntelAMD
SeriesCeleron--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2014--
Production StatusActive--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron N2807
9763% of 36,991
A8-641091% better
1,8675% of 36,991

The A8-6410 has 91% better performance than the Celeron N2807 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron N2807 is ranked 702nd with a score of 976, and the A8-6410 is ranked 628th with a score of 1,867.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N2807
No data available
A8-6410
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N2807 and the A8-6410 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N2807 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Celeron J40051,877+92%
Pentium N35301,875+92%
A8-64101,867+91%
A6-73101,849+89%
A8-74101,835+88%
A4-4355M994+2%
Celeron N3060993+2%
Celeron N2807976
Celeron N2820967-1%
Celeron N3050932-5%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N2807 orA8-6410
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron N2807A8-6410
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
976
1,867
(+91.29%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
65
165
(+153.85%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
35
49
(+40%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
248
577
(+132.66%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
151
216
(+43.05%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
505
1,762
(+248.91%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
572
785
(+37.24%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron N2807A8-6410
ManufacturerIntelAMD
FoundryIntel--
Process Size22 nm28 nm
Transistors--930 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron N2807A8-6410
SeriesCeleron--
MicroarchitectureBay Trail--
CodenameBay Trail-MBeema
Memory SupportDDR3--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N2807A8-6410
Cores24
Threads24
Clock Speed1580.0 MHz2000.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2.2 GHz2400.0 MHz
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N2807A8-6410
L1 Cache56 KB256 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron N2807A8-6410
SocketIntel BGA 1170BGA769 (FT3b)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)4 W15 W
TJ Max105 °C--

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron N2807A8-6410
Integrated GraphicsHD GraphicsRadeon R5 Series
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EIST, XD bit, BPT, NX--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.