Intel Celeron N2807 vs AMD 3020e

VS
Performance
Celeron N2807
9763% of 36,991
3020e168% better
2,6187% of 36,991

The 3020e has 168% better performance than the Celeron N2807 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N2807
No data available
3020e
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N2807 and the 3020e for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N2807
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron N2807 CPU

The Intel Celeron N2807 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2014. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Bay Trail microarchitecture. The N2807 is compatible with Intel BGA 1170 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron N2807 supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron N2807 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N2807 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1580.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2.2 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N2807 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N2807 has the 702nd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.64% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD 3020e CPU

The AMD 3020e is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 3020e is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the AMD Radeon Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the 3020e has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 192 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 3020e features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1200.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2600.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The 3020e includes an integrated graphics solution called AMD Radeon Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The 3020e has the 556th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 7.08% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron N28073020e
ManufacturerIntelAMD
SeriesCeleron--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2014--
Production StatusActive--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron N2807
9763% of 36,991
3020e168% better
2,6187% of 36,991

The 3020e has 168% better performance than the Celeron N2807 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron N2807 is ranked 702nd with a score of 976, and the 3020e is ranked 556th with a score of 2,618.

Performance per dollar
Celeron N2807
No data available
3020e
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron N2807 and the 3020e for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N2807 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
A10-5750M2,658+172%
Pentium Silver N50002,619+168%
3020e2,618+168%
Core M-5Y10a2,605+167%
A10-4600M2,596.5+166%
A4-4355M994+2%
Celeron N3060993+2%
Celeron N2807976
Celeron N2820967-1%
Celeron N3050932-5%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron N2807 or3020e
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron N28073020e
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
976
2,618
(+168.24%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
65
196
(+201.54%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
35
92
(+162.86%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
248
1,101
(+343.95%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
151
664
(+339.74%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
505
2,458
(+386.73%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
572
1,419
(+148.08%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron N28073020e
ManufacturerIntelAMD
FoundryIntel--
Process Size22 nm14 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron N28073020e
SeriesCeleron--
MicroarchitectureBay Trail--
CodenameBay Trail-M--
Memory SupportDDR3--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N28073020e
Cores22
Threads22
Clock Speed1580.0 MHz1200.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2.2 GHz2600.0 MHz
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron N28073020e
L1 Cache56 KB192 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1 MB
L3 Cache--4 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron N28073020e
SocketIntel BGA 1170--
Thermal Design Power (TDP)4 W6 W
TJ Max105 °C--

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron N28073020e
Integrated GraphicsHD GraphicsAMD Radeon Graphics
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EIST, XD bit, BPT, NX--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.