Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5

VS
Performance
Celeron J4025
4,28412% of 36,991
Xeon E3-1535M v5130% better
9,86627% of 36,991

The Xeon E3-1535M v5 has 130% better performance than the Celeron J4025 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron J4025153% better
40.0433% of 121.53
Xeon E3-1535M v5
15.8413% of 121.53

The Celeron J4025 has 153% better value for the money than the Xeon E3-1535M v5 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron J4025
Shop Xeon E3-1535M v5
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron J4025 CPU

The Intel Celeron J4025 is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2019 with a suggested retail price of $107. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Goldmont Plus microarchitecture. The J4025 is compatible with Intel BGA 1090 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the UHD Graphics 600 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron J4025 supports DDR4 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Celeron J4025 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 4 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron J4025 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2000.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2.9 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron J4025 includes an integrated graphics solution called UHD Graphics 600. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The Celeron J4025 has the 433rd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 11.58% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Its 4,284 score and $107 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 40.04. This is the 78th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Perf. Physics benchmark.

About the Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 CPU

The Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 is an end-of-life 4-core (8-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2015 with a suggested retail price of $623. It is part of Intel's Xeon E3 lineup, which is based on the Skylake-H microarchitecture. The E3-1535M v5 is compatible with Intel BGA 1440 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics P530 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Xeon E3-1535M v5 supports DDR3, DDR4 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Xeon E3-1535M v5 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 8 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Xeon E3-1535M v5 features 4 total cores which can process 8 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.9 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.7 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Xeon E3-1535M v5 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics P530. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The Xeon E3-1535M v5 has the 252nd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 26.67% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Its 9,866 score and $623 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 15.84. This is the 176th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Perf. Physics benchmark.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron J4025Xeon E3-1535M v5
ManufacturerIntelIntel
SeriesCeleronXeon E3
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ4 2019Q4 2015
Launch Price (MSRP)$107$623
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron J4025
4,28412% of 36,991
Xeon E3-1535M v5130% better
9,86627% of 36,991

The Xeon E3-1535M v5 has 130% better performance than the Celeron J4025 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron J4025 is ranked 433rd with a score of 4,284, and the Xeon E3-1535M v5 is ranked 252nd with a score of 9,866.

Performance per dollar
Celeron J4025153% better
40.0433% of 121.53
Xeon E3-1535M v5
15.8413% of 121.53

The Celeron J4025 has 153% better value for the money than the Xeon E3-1535M v5 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron J4025 is ranked 78th with a performance per dollar of 40.04, and the Xeon E3-1535M v5 is ranked 176th with a performance per dollar of 15.84.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron J4025 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core i7-7820HK10,019+134%
Core i7-7920HQ10,006+134%
Xeon E3-1535M v59,866+130%
Core i5-1135G79,456+121%
Core i5-1038NG79,402+119%
Core i7-740QM4,450+4%
Core i7-5557U4,423+3%
Celeron J40254,284
Core i3-8145U4,267.5-0%
Core i7-5500U4,008-6%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron J4025 or
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Processor N10047.88+20%
Celeron J402540.04
Core i5-7440HQ26.33-34%
Celeron J412525.29-37%
Core i5-7300HQ24.17-40%
Core i7-8565U16.48-59%
Core i3-N30016.13-60%
Xeon E3-1535M v515.84-60%
Core i7-4910MQ15.27-62%
Core i3-8145U15.19-62%

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron J4025Xeon E3-1535M v5
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
4,284
9,866
(+130.3%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
148
745.5
(+403.72%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
77
159.5
(+107.14%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
550
3,722
(+576.73%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
337
1,296
(+284.57%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,470
7,517
(+411.36%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,142
2,122
(+85.81%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron J4025Xeon E3-1535M v5
ManufacturerIntelIntel
FoundryIntelIntel
Process Size14 nm14 nm
Transistors--2,300 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron J4025Xeon E3-1535M v5
SeriesCeleronXeon E3
MicroarchitectureGoldmont PlusSkylake-H
CodenameGemini LakeSkylake-H
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3, DDR4
Memory ChannelsDual-channelDual-channel
ECC MemoryNoYes

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron J4025Xeon E3-1535M v5
Cores24
Threads28
Clock Speed2000.0 MHz2.9 GHz
Turbo Clock2.9 GHz3.7 GHz
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Multiplier20.0x29.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron J4025Xeon E3-1535M v5
L1 Cache56 KB64 KB
L2 Cache4 MB256 KB
L3 Cache--8 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron J4025Xeon E3-1535M v5
SocketIntel BGA 1090Intel BGA 1440
PCI ExpressPCIe 2.0 x6PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)10 W45 W
TJ Max105 °C100 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron J4025Xeon E3-1535M v5
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 600HD Graphics P530
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, AES-NI, SHA, F16C, EM64T, VT-x, VT-d, EPT, EIST, XD-bit, SGXMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, EIST, Intel 64, XD bit, TXT, VT-x, VT-d, AES-NI, ECC, HTT, FMA3, F16C, BMI1, BMI2, x8 SDDC, vPro, Boost 2.0

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.