Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i7-5557U
The Core i7-5557U has 3% better performance than the Celeron J4025 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Celeron J4025 has 286% better value for the money than the Core i7-5557U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel Celeron J4025 CPU
The Intel Celeron J4025 is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2019 with a suggested retail price of $107. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Goldmont Plus microarchitecture. The J4025 is compatible with Intel BGA 1090 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the UHD Graphics 600 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The Celeron J4025 supports DDR4 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Celeron J4025 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 4 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron J4025 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2000.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2.9 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron J4025 includes an integrated graphics solution called UHD Graphics 600. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The Celeron J4025 has the 432nd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 11.58% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Its 4,284 score and $107 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 40.04. This is the 78th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Perf. Physics benchmark.
About the Intel Core i7-5557U CPU
The Intel Core i7-5557U is an end-of-life 2-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2015 with a suggested retail price of $426. It is part of Intel's Core i7 lineup, which is based on the Broadwell-U microarchitecture. The i7-5557U is compatible with Intel BGA 1168 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel Iris 6100 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The Core i7-5557U supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Core i7-5557U has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Core i7-5557U features 2 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 3.1 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.4 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The Core i7-5557U includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel Iris 6100. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The Core i7-5557U has the 424th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 11.96% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Its 4,423 score and $426 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 10.38. This is the 190th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Perf. Physics benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Celeron J4025 | Core i7-5557U |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Celeron | Core i7 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q4 2019 | Q1 2015 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $107 | $426 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
The Core i7-5557U has 3% better performance than the Celeron J4025 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Celeron J4025 is ranked 432nd with a score of 4,284, and the Core i7-5557U is ranked 424th with a score of 4,423.
The Celeron J4025 has 286% better value for the money than the Core i7-5557U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Celeron J4025 is ranked 78th with a performance per dollar of 40.04, and the Core i7-5557U is ranked 190th with a performance per dollar of 10.38.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Core i3-N300 | 4,983 | +16% |
| Core i7-840QM | 4,686 | +9% |
| Core i3-7100H | 4,559 | +6% |
| Core i7-740QM | 4,450 | +4% |
| Core i7-5557U | 4,423 | +3% |
| Celeron J4025 | 4,284 | |
| Core i3-8145U | 4,267.5 | -0% |
| Core i7-5500U | 4,008 | -6% |
| Core i7-820QM | 4,002 | -7% |
| Core i7-720QM | 3,936 | -8% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor N100 | 47.88 | +20% |
| Celeron J4025 | 40.04 | |
| Core i5-7440HQ | 26.33 | -34% |
| Celeron J4125 | 25.29 | -37% |
| Core i5-7300HQ | 24.17 | -40% |
| Core i5-L16G7 | 10.73 | -73% |
| Core i3-5010U | 10.68 | -73% |
| Core i7-5557U | 10.38 | -74% |
| Core i7-5500U | 10.2 | -75% |
| Core i7-640M | 9.7 | -76% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Celeron J4025 | Core i7-5557U |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 4,284 | 4,423 (+3.24%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy CPU | -- | 1,577 |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 148 | 353 (+138.51%) |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 77 | 140 (+81.82%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 548 | 2,062 (+276.28%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 337 | 1,042 (+209.2%) |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 1,470 | 3,097 (+110.68%) |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 1,142 | 1,913 (+67.51%) |
Technical Specs
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Celeron J4025 | Core i7-5557U |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 1,900 million |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Celeron J4025 | Core i7-5557U |
|---|---|---|
| Series | Celeron | Core i7 |
| Microarchitecture | Goldmont Plus | Broadwell-U |
| Codename | Gemini Lake | Broadwell-U |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Memory Channels | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |
| ECC Memory | No | No |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron J4025 | Core i7-5557U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 2 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Clock Speed | 2000.0 MHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Turbo Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 20.0x | 31.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron J4025 | Core i7-5557U |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 56 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 256 KB |
| L3 Cache | -- | 4 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Celeron J4025 | Core i7-5557U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | Intel BGA 1090 | Intel BGA 1168 |
| PCI Express | PCIe 2.0 x6 | PCIe 2.0 x12 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 W | 28 W |
| Tcase Max | -- | 105 °C |
| TJ Max | 105 °C | 105 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Celeron J4025 | Core i7-5557U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 600 | Intel Iris 6100 |
| Extensions / Technologies | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, AES-NI, SHA, F16C, EM64T, VT-x, VT-d, EPT, EIST, XD-bit, SGX | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, EIST, 64-bit, XD bit, VT-d, VT-x, Smart Cache, ADX, RDSEED, PREFETCHW, HTT, Boost 2.0 |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.