Performance
Celeron J4005
1,8775% of 36,991
Core i7-3740QM315% better
7,782.521% of 36,991
The Core i7-3740QM has 315% better performance than the Celeron J4005 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Celeron J4005
17.5414% of 121.53
Core i7-3740QM
No data available
The Celeron J4005 has 14% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark: Intel Core i5-13400F.
Shop Celeron J4005
Shop Core i7-3740QM
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Celeron J4005 CPU
The Intel Celeron J4005 is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2017 with a suggested retail price of $107. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Goldmont Plus microarchitecture. The J4005 is compatible with Intel BGA 1090 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the UHD Graphics 600 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The Celeron J4005 supports DDR4 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Celeron J4005 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 4 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron J4005 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2000.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2.7 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron J4005 includes an integrated graphics solution called UHD Graphics 600. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The Celeron J4005 has the 626th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.07% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Its 1,877 score and $107 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 17.54. This is the 169th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Perf. Physics benchmark.
About the Intel Core i7-3740QM CPU
The Intel Core i7-3740QM is a 4-core (8-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q3 2012. It is part of Intel's Core i7 lineup, which is based on the Ivy Bridge microarchitecture. The i7-3740QM is compatible with Intel BGA 1224 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD 4000 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Core i7-3740QM has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 6 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Core i7-3740QM features 4 total cores which can process 8 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.7 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.7 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The Core i7-3740QM includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD 4000. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Core i7-3740QM has the 321st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 21.04% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Celeron J4005 | Core i7-3740QM |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Celeron | Core i7 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q4 2017 | Q3 2012 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $107 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | -- |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Celeron J4005
1,8775% of 36,991
Core i7-3740QM315% better
7,782.521% of 36,991
The Core i7-3740QM has 315% better performance than the Celeron J4005 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Celeron J4005 is ranked 626th with a score of 1,877, and the Core i7-3740QM is ranked 321st with a score of 7,782.5.
Performance per dollar
Celeron J4005
17.5414% of 121.53
Core i7-3740QM
No data available
The Celeron J4005 has 33% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
Celeron J4005's 17.54 performance per dollar ranks it 169th among the other benchmarked CPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron J4005 or
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Core i5-8257U | 7,866 | +319% |
| Core i7-3840QM | 7,786.5 | +315% |
| Core i7-3740QM | 7,782.5 | +315% |
| Ryzen 5 7520U | 7,743 | +313% |
| Core i7-4720HQ | 7,718 | +311% |
| Core m5-6Y54 | 2,529 | +35% |
| Celeron 3865U | 1,906 | +2% |
| Celeron J4005 | 1,877 | |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron J4005 orCore i7-3740QM
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Core i5-8265U | 20.95 | +19% |
| Core i3-7100H | 20.26 | +16% |
| Pentium Gold 5405U | 19.56 | +11% |
| Core i7-4712HQ | 18.49 | +5% |
| Celeron 3865U | 17.81 | +2% |
| Celeron J4005 | 17.54 | |
| Core i7-4702MQ | 16.62 | -5% |
| Pentium Silver N5000 | 16.27 | -7% |
| Core i3-N300 | 16.13 | -8% |
| Core i3-8145U | 15.19 | -13% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Celeron J4005 | Core i7-3740QM |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,877 | 7,782.5 (+314.62%) |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 144 | -- |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 77 | -- |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 577 | 1,980 (+243.15%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 343 | 595 (+73.47%) |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 1,567 | 5,693 (+263.31%) |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 1,096 | 1,875 (+71.08%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Celeron J4005 | Core i7-3740QM |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 1,400 million |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Celeron J4005 | Core i7-3740QM |
|---|---|---|
| Series | Celeron | Core i7 |
| Microarchitecture | Goldmont Plus | Ivy Bridge |
| Codename | Gemini Lake | Ivy Bridge |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | -- |
| Memory Channels | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |
| ECC Memory | No | No |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron J4005 | Core i7-3740QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Clock Speed | 2000.0 MHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Turbo Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 20.0x | 27.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron J4005 | Core i7-3740QM |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 56 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 256 KB |
| L3 Cache | -- | 6 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Celeron J4005 | Core i7-3740QM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | Intel BGA 1090 | Intel BGA 1224 |
| PCI Express | PCIe 2.0 x6 | -- |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 W | 45 W |
| TJ Max | 105 °C | 105 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Celeron J4005 | Core i7-3740QM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 600 | Intel HD 4000 |
| Extensions / Technologies | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, AES-NI, SHA, F16C, EM64T, VT-x, VT-d, EPT, EIST, XD-bit, SGX | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, AVX, EIST, Intel 64, XD bit, TXT, VT-x, VT-d, HTT, AES-NI |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.