Performance
Celeron 630563% better
1,935.55% of 36,991
Atom x7-Z8700
1,1863% of 36,991
The Celeron 6305 has 63% better performance than the Atom x7-Z8700 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Celeron 6305
No data available
Atom x7-Z8700
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 6305 and the Atom x7-Z8700 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Shop Celeron 6305
Shop Atom x7-Z8700
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Celeron 6305 CPU
The Intel Celeron 6305 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 6305 is compatible with FCBGA1449 motherboards and is fabricated on a 10 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Celeron 6305 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 160 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2.5 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron 6305 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron 6305 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron 6305 has the 619th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.23% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the Intel Atom x7-Z8700 CPU
The Intel Atom x7-Z8700 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The x7-Z8700 is compatible with UTFCBGA1380 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Atom x7-Z8700 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 448 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Atom x7-Z8700 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Atom x7-Z8700 does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.
Benchmark Performance
The Atom x7-Z8700 has the 693rd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.21% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Celeron 6305 | Atom x7-Z8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Celeron 630563% better
1,935.55% of 36,991
Atom x7-Z8700
1,1863% of 36,991
The Celeron 6305 has 63% better performance than the Atom x7-Z8700 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Celeron 6305 is ranked 619th with a score of 1,935.5, and the Atom x7-Z8700 is ranked 693rd with a score of 1,186.
Performance per dollar
Celeron 6305
No data available
Atom x7-Z8700
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 6305 and the Atom x7-Z8700 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 6305 or
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| A6-5200 | 1,964.5 | +1% |
| Phenom II X4 N970 | 1,940 | +0% |
| Celeron 6305 | 1,935.5 | |
| Celeron N3450 | 1,925 | -1% |
| Core i3-2365M | 1,915 | -1% |
| E2-9000 | 1,199 | -38% |
| A6-1450 | 1,193.5 | -38% |
| Atom x7-Z8700 | 1,186 | -39% |
| Atom Z3736F | 1,144 | -41% |
| Pentium 2129Y | 1,138 | -41% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 6305 orAtom x7-Z8700
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Celeron 6305 | Atom x7-Z8700 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,935.5 (+63.2%) | 1,186 |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 161.1 (+38.88%) | 116 |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 84 (+124%) | 37.5 |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 1,236 (+147.2%) | 500 |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 744 (+320.34%) | 177 |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 2,089 (+56.6%) | 1,334 |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 1,197 (+83.87%) | 651 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Celeron 6305 | Atom x7-Z8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Process Size | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Celeron 6305 | Atom x7-Z8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Tiger Lake | Cherry Trail |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron 6305 | Atom x7-Z8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Clock Speed | 1800.0 MHz | 1600.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | -- | 2400.0 MHz |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron 6305 | Atom x7-Z8700 |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 0 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Celeron 6305 | Atom x7-Z8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | UTFCBGA1380 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 4 W |
| TJ Max | 100 °C | 90 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Celeron 6305 | Atom x7-Z8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors | -- |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.