Intel Celeron 3865U vs Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5

VS
Performance
Celeron 3865U
1,9065% of 36,991
Xeon E3-1535M v5418% better
9,86627% of 36,991

The Xeon E3-1535M v5 has 418% better performance than the Celeron 3865U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron 3865U12% better
17.8115% of 121.53
Xeon E3-1535M v5
15.8413% of 121.53

The Celeron 3865U has 12% better value for the money than the Xeon E3-1535M v5 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron 3865U
Shop Xeon E3-1535M v5
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron 3865U CPU

The Intel Celeron 3865U is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2017 with a suggested retail price of $107. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Kaby Lake-U microarchitecture. The 3865U is compatible with Intel BGA 1356 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics 610 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron 3865U supports DDR4-2133, DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Celeron 3865U has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron 3865U features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron 3865U includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics 610. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The Celeron 3865U has the 623rd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.15% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Its 1,906 score and $107 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 17.81. This is the 167th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Perf. Physics benchmark.

About the Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 CPU

The Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 is an end-of-life 4-core (8-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2015 with a suggested retail price of $623. It is part of Intel's Xeon E3 lineup, which is based on the Skylake-H microarchitecture. The E3-1535M v5 is compatible with Intel BGA 1440 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics P530 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Xeon E3-1535M v5 supports DDR3, DDR4 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Xeon E3-1535M v5 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 8 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Xeon E3-1535M v5 features 4 total cores which can process 8 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.9 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.7 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Xeon E3-1535M v5 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics P530. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The Xeon E3-1535M v5 has the 252nd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 26.67% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Its 9,866 score and $623 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 15.84. This is the 176th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Perf. Physics benchmark.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron 3865UXeon E3-1535M v5
ManufacturerIntelIntel
SeriesCeleronXeon E3
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2017Q4 2015
Launch Price (MSRP)$107$623
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron 3865U
1,9065% of 36,991
Xeon E3-1535M v5418% better
9,86627% of 36,991

The Xeon E3-1535M v5 has 418% better performance than the Celeron 3865U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron 3865U is ranked 623rd with a score of 1,906, and the Xeon E3-1535M v5 is ranked 252nd with a score of 9,866.

Performance per dollar
Celeron 3865U12% better
17.8115% of 121.53
Xeon E3-1535M v5
15.8413% of 121.53

The Celeron 3865U has 12% better value for the money than the Xeon E3-1535M v5 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron 3865U is ranked 167th with a performance per dollar of 17.81, and the Xeon E3-1535M v5 is ranked 176th with a performance per dollar of 15.84.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 3865U or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core i7-7820HK10,019+426%
Core i7-7920HQ10,006+425%
Xeon E3-1535M v59,866+418%
Core i5-1135G79,456+396%
Core i5-1038NG79,402+393%
Pentium Silver N50002,619+37%
Core m5-6Y542,529+33%
Celeron 3865U1,906
Celeron J40051,877-2%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 3865U or
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Core i7-4712HQ18.49+4%
Core i7-3630QM18.4+3%
Celeron 3865U17.81
Celeron J400517.54-2%
Core i7-4702MQ16.62-7%
Core i7-8565U16.48-8%
Core i3-N30016.13-9%
Xeon E3-1535M v515.84-11%
Core i7-4910MQ15.27-14%
Core i3-8145U15.19-15%

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron 3865UXeon E3-1535M v5
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,906
9,866
(+417.63%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
142
745.5
(+425%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
72
159.5
(+121.53%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
693
3,722
(+437.09%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
393
1,296
(+229.77%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,320
7,517
(+469.47%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,035
2,122
(+105.02%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron 3865UXeon E3-1535M v5
ManufacturerIntelIntel
FoundryIntelIntel
Process Size14 nm14 nm
Transistors--2,300 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron 3865UXeon E3-1535M v5
SeriesCeleronXeon E3
MicroarchitectureKaby Lake-USkylake-H
CodenameKaby Lake-USkylake-H
Memory SupportDDR4-2133, DDR3DDR3, DDR4
Memory ChannelsDual-channelDual-channel
ECC MemoryNoYes

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron 3865UXeon E3-1535M v5
Cores24
Threads28
Clock Speed1800.0 MHz2.9 GHz
Turbo Clock--3.7 GHz
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Multiplier18.0x29.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron 3865UXeon E3-1535M v5
L1 Cache64 KB64 KB
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB
L3 Cache2 MB8 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron 3865UXeon E3-1535M v5
SocketIntel BGA 1356Intel BGA 1440
PCI ExpressPCIe 2.0 x10PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W45 W
TJ Max100 °C100 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron 3865UXeon E3-1535M v5
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 610HD Graphics P530
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, EIST, Intel 64, XD bit, VT-x, VT-d, AES-NIMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, EIST, Intel 64, XD bit, TXT, VT-x, VT-d, AES-NI, ECC, HTT, FMA3, F16C, BMI1, BMI2, x8 SDDC, vPro, Boost 2.0

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.