PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

Intel Celeron 2970M vs Intel Core M-5Y10c

Intel
VS
Intel
Performance
Celeron 2970M
2,272.56% of 36,991
Core M-5Y10c2% better
2,3116% of 36,991

The Core M-5Y10c has 2% better performance than the Celeron 2970M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron 2970M
No data available
Core M-5Y10c
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 2970M and the Core M-5Y10c for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron 2970M
Shop Core M-5Y10c
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron 2970M CPU

The Intel Celeron 2970M is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 2970M is compatible with FCPGA946 motherboards and is fabricated on a 22 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron 2970M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron 2970M features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2200.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron 2970M does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron 2970M has the 588th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.14% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Core M-5Y10c CPU

The Intel Core M-5Y10c is a 2-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2014. It is part of Intel's Core M lineup, which is based on the Broadwell-Y microarchitecture. The M-5Y10c is compatible with Intel BGA 1234 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD 5300 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Core M-5Y10c supports DDR4 memory. In terms of cache, the Core M-5Y10c has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Core M-5Y10c features 2 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 800.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2000.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Core M-5Y10c includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD 5300. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Core M-5Y10c has the 586th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.25% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron 2970MCore M-5Y10c
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Series--Core M
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q4 2014
Production Status--Active
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron 2970M
2,272.56% of 36,991
Core M-5Y10c2% better
2,3116% of 36,991

The Core M-5Y10c has 2% better performance than the Celeron 2970M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron 2970M is ranked 588th with a score of 2,272.5, and the Core M-5Y10c is ranked 586th with a score of 2,311.

Performance per dollar
Celeron 2970M
No data available
Core M-5Y10c
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 2970M and the Core M-5Y10c for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 2970M or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core i3-4010U2,340+3%
Pentium Gold 4415Y2,319+2%
A8-5557M2,318+2%
Core i5-3339Y2,313+2%
Core M-5Y10c2,311+2%
PRO A12-9800B2,275+0%
Celeron 2970M2,272.5
A8-3500M2,247-1%
A8-4500M2,243-1%
FX-75002,236.5-2%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 2970M orCore M-5Y10c
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron 2970MCore M-5Y10c
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
2,272.5
2,311
(+1.69%)
3DMark Time Spy CPU
900
--
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
164
164
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
85
(+28.79%)
66
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
--
1,207
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
--
623
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,501
1,901
(+26.65%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,245
(+10.37%)
1,128
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron 2970MCore M-5Y10c
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Foundry--Intel
Process Size22 nm14 nm
Transistors960 million1,300 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron 2970MCore M-5Y10c
Series--Core M
Microarchitecture--Broadwell-Y
Codename--Broadwell-Y
Memory Support--DDR4
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron 2970MCore M-5Y10c
Cores22
Threads24
Clock Speed2200.0 MHz800.0 MHz
Turbo Clock--2000.0 MHz
Base Clock--100 MHz
Multiplier--8.0x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron 2970MCore M-5Y10c
L1 Cache128 KB64 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB
L3 Cache2 MB4 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron 2970MCore M-5Y10c
SocketFCPGA946Intel BGA 1234
Thermal Design Power (TDP)37 W5 W
TJ Max100 °C95 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron 2970MCore M-5Y10c
Integrated Graphics--Intel HD 5300
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, AVX, EIST, Intel 64, XD bit, VT-x, HTT

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.