Intel Celeron 2970M vs AMD FX-7500

VS
Performance
Celeron 2970M2% better
2,272.56% of 36,991
FX-7500
2,236.56% of 36,991

The Celeron 2970M has 2% better performance than the FX-7500 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron 2970M
No data available
FX-7500
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 2970M and the FX-7500 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron 2970M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron 2970M CPU

The Intel Celeron 2970M is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 2970M is compatible with FCPGA946 motherboards and is fabricated on a 22 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron 2970M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron 2970M features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2200.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron 2970M does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron 2970M has the 589th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.14% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD FX-7500 CPU

The AMD FX-7500 is an end-of-life 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2014. It is part of AMD's FX lineup, which is based on the Kaveri microarchitecture. The FX-7500 is compatible with AMD Socket FP3 motherboards and is fabricated on GlobalFoundries's 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R7 6CU integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The FX-7500 supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the FX-7500 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The FX-7500 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.1 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.3 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The FX-7500 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R7 6CU. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The FX-7500 has the 592nd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.05% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron 2970MFX-7500
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Series--FX
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q2 2014
Production Status--End-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron 2970M2% better
2,272.56% of 36,991
FX-7500
2,236.56% of 36,991

The Celeron 2970M has 2% better performance than the FX-7500 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron 2970M is ranked 589th with a score of 2,272.5, and the FX-7500 is ranked 592nd with a score of 2,236.5.

Performance per dollar
Celeron 2970M
No data available
FX-7500
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 2970M and the FX-7500 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 2970M or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core i5-3339Y2,313+2%
Core M-5Y10c2,311+2%
PRO A12-9800B2,275+0%
Celeron 2970M2,272.5
A8-3500M2,247-1%
A8-4500M2,243-1%
FX-75002,236.5-2%
A10-4655M2,236-2%
Core i5-450M2,222-2%
Celeron N41002,213-3%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 2970M orFX-7500
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron 2970MFX-7500
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
2,272.5
(+1.61%)
2,236.5
3DMark Time Spy CPU
900
--
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
164
(+7.19%)
153
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
85
(+54.55%)
55
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
--
689
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
--
310
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,501
1,970
(+31.25%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,245
(+27.95%)
973
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron 2970MFX-7500
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Foundry--GlobalFoundries
Process Size22 nm28 nm
Transistors960 million2,410 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron 2970MFX-7500
Series--FX
Microarchitecture--Kaveri
Codename--Kaveri
Memory Support--DDR3
Memory Channels--Dual-channel
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron 2970MFX-7500
Cores24
Threads24
Clock Speed2200.0 MHz2.1 GHz
Turbo Clock--3.3 GHz
Base Clock--100 MHz
Multiplier--21.0x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron 2970MFX-7500
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB
L3 Cache2 MB--

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron 2970MFX-7500
SocketFCPGA946AMD Socket FP3
PCI Express--PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)37 W19 W
TJ Max100 °C102 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron 2970MFX-7500
Integrated Graphics--Radeon R7 6CU
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD64, AES, AVX, BMI1, FMA3, FMA4, F16C, TBM, XOP, AMD-V, EVP, Turbo Core

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.