Performance
Celeron 2957U1% better
1,5244% of 36,991
Celeron N3150
1,5164% of 36,991
The Celeron 2957U has 1% better performance than the Celeron N3150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Celeron 2957U
No data available
Celeron N3150
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 2957U and the Celeron N3150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Shop Celeron 2957U
Shop Celeron N3150
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Celeron 2957U CPU
The Intel Celeron 2957U is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 2957U is compatible with FCBGA1168 motherboards and is fabricated on a 22 nm manufacturing process.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Celeron 2957U has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron 2957U features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1400.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron 2957U does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron 2957U has the 665th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.12% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the Intel Celeron N3150 CPU
The Intel Celeron N3150 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N3150 is compatible with FCBGA1170 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Celeron N3150 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 448 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron N3150 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2080.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron N3150 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron N3150 has the 666th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.10% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Celeron 2957U | Celeron N3150 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Celeron 2957U1% better
1,5244% of 36,991
Celeron N3150
1,5164% of 36,991
The Celeron 2957U has 1% better performance than the Celeron N3150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Celeron 2957U is ranked 665th with a score of 1,524, and the Celeron N3150 is ranked 666th with a score of 1,516.
Performance per dollar
Celeron 2957U
No data available
Celeron N3150
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 2957U and the Celeron N3150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 2957U or
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 P960 | 1,542 | +1% |
| Celeron 1017U | 1,532 | +1% |
| A4-5150M | 1,531 | +0% |
| A9-9425 | 1,527 | +0% |
| Celeron 2957U | 1,524 | |
| Celeron N3150 | 1,516 | -1% |
| Celeron N4500 | 1,507 | -1% |
| Atom x7-Z8750 | 1,499 | -2% |
| A9-9410 | 1,470 | -4% |
| A6-9220 | 1,469.5 | -4% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 2957U orCeleron N3150
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Celeron 2957U | Celeron N3150 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,524 (+0.53%) | 1,516 |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 105 | 118 (+12.38%) |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 55 (+71.88%) | 32 |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | -- | 492 |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | -- | 161 |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 857 | 1,199 (+39.91%) |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 779 (+36.67%) | 570 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Celeron 2957U | Celeron N3150 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Process Size | 22 nm | 14 nm |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Celeron 2957U | Celeron N3150 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | -- | Braswell |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron 2957U | Celeron N3150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Clock Speed | 1400.0 MHz | 1600.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | -- | 2080.0 MHz |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron 2957U | Celeron N3150 |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 0 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Celeron 2957U | Celeron N3150 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | FCBGA1170 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 6 W |
| TJ Max | -- | 90 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Celeron 2957U | Celeron N3150 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | -- | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.