The Phenom II X4 P960 has 1% better performance than the Celeron 2957U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 2957U and the Phenom II X4 P960 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel Celeron 2957U CPU
The Intel Celeron 2957U is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 2957U is compatible with FCBGA1168 motherboards and is fabricated on a 22 nm manufacturing process.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Celeron 2957U has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron 2957U features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1400.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron 2957U does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron 2957U has the 665th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.12% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the AMD Phenom II X4 P960 CPU
The AMD Phenom II X4 P960 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The X4 P960 is compatible with S1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 45 nm manufacturing process.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Phenom II X4 P960 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 512 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Phenom II X4 P960 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Phenom II X4 P960 does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.
Benchmark Performance
The Phenom II X4 P960 has the 661st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.17% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
Info | Celeron 2957U | Phenom II X4 P960 |
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
The Phenom II X4 P960 has 1% better performance than the Celeron 2957U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Celeron 2957U is ranked 665th with a score of 1,524, and the Phenom II X4 P960 is ranked 661st with a score of 1,542.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 2957U and the Phenom II X4 P960 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
---|---|---|
A4-6210 | 1,587.5 | +4% |
Celeron N2920 | 1,582 | +4% |
A6-9225 | 1,568 | +3% |
Phenom II X4 P960 | 1,542 | +1% |
Celeron 1017U | 1,532 | +1% |
A4-5150M | 1,531 | +0% |
A9-9425 | 1,527 | +0% |
Celeron 2957U | 1,524 | |
Celeron N3150 | 1,516 | -1% |
Celeron N4500 | 1,507 | -1% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
---|---|---|---|
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
Benchmark | Celeron 2957U | Phenom II X4 P960 |
---|---|---|
3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,524 | 1,542 (+1.18%) |
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 105 | -- |
Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 55 | -- |
CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 857 | 1,386 (+61.73%) |
CPU Mark Single-Thread | 779 (+5.7%) | 737 |
Technical Specs
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
Spec | Celeron 2957U | Phenom II X4 P960 |
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
Process Size | 22 nm | 45 nm |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
Spec | Celeron 2957U | Phenom II X4 P960 |
---|---|---|
Cores | 2 | 4 |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Clock Speed | 1400.0 MHz | 1800.0 MHz |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
Spec | Celeron 2957U | Phenom II X4 P960 |
---|---|---|
L1 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | 2 MB |
L3 Cache | 2 MB | -- |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
Spec | Celeron 2957U | Phenom II X4 P960 |
---|---|---|
Socket | FCBGA1168 | S1 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 25 W |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.