Intel Celeron 2957U vs AMD A4-4300M

VS
Performance
Celeron 2957U12% better
1,5244% of 36,991
A4-4300M
1,3554% of 36,991

The Celeron 2957U has 12% better performance than the A4-4300M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron 2957U
No data available
A4-4300M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 2957U and the A4-4300M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron 2957U
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron 2957U CPU

The Intel Celeron 2957U is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 2957U is compatible with FCBGA1168 motherboards and is fabricated on a 22 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron 2957U has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron 2957U features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1400.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron 2957U does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron 2957U has the 665th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.12% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD A4-4300M CPU

The AMD A4-4300M is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2012. It is part of AMD's A4 lineup, which is based on the Trinity microarchitecture. The A4-4300M is compatible with AMD Socket FS1r2 motherboards and is fabricated on GlobalFoundries's 32 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 7420G integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The A4-4300M supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the A4-4300M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 96 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A4-4300M features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.5 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.0 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The A4-4300M includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 7420G. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A4-4300M has the 677th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.66% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron 2957UA4-4300M
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Series--A4
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q2 2012
Production Status--End-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron 2957U12% better
1,5244% of 36,991
A4-4300M
1,3554% of 36,991

The Celeron 2957U has 12% better performance than the A4-4300M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron 2957U is ranked 665th with a score of 1,524, and the A4-4300M is ranked 677th with a score of 1,355.

Performance per dollar
Celeron 2957U
No data available
A4-4300M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 2957U and the A4-4300M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 2957U or
CPUBenchmark Performance
A4-5150M1,531+0%
A9-94251,527+0%
Celeron 2957U1,524
Celeron N31501,516-1%
Celeron N45001,507-1%
A4-3300M1,396-8%
Pentium 3560Y1,365-10%
A4-4300M1,355-11%
Atom x5-Z85001,353-11%
Atom Z3745D1,345-12%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 2957U orA4-4300M
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron 2957UA4-4300M
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,524
(+12.47%)
1,355
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
105
(+12.9%)
93
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
55
60
(+9.09%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
--
390
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
--
295
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
857
1,000
(+16.69%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
779
1,014
(+30.17%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron 2957UA4-4300M
ManufacturerIntelAMD
Foundry--GlobalFoundries
Process Size22 nm32 nm
Transistors--1,303 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron 2957UA4-4300M
Series--A4
Microarchitecture--Trinity
Codename--Trinity
Memory Support--DDR3
Memory Channels--Dual-channel
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron 2957UA4-4300M
Cores22
Threads22
Clock Speed1400.0 MHz2.5 GHz
Turbo Clock--3.0 GHz
Base Clock--100 MHz
Multiplier--25.0x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron 2957UA4-4300M
L1 Cache128 KB96 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1 MB
L3 Cache2 MB--

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron 2957UA4-4300M
SocketFCBGA1168AMD Socket FS1r2
PCI Express--PCIe 2.0
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W35 W

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron 2957UA4-4300M
Integrated Graphics--Radeon HD 7420G
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, FMA3, F16C, XOP, ABM, TBM, Turbo Core

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.