Intel Celeron 2955U vs Intel Pentium N3710

VS
Performance
Celeron 2955U
1,6044% of 36,991
Pentium N37109% better
1,742.55% of 36,991

The Pentium N3710 has 9% better performance than the Celeron 2955U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron 2955U
No data available
Pentium N3710
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 2955U and the Pentium N3710 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron 2955U
Shop Pentium N3710
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron 2955U CPU

The Intel Celeron 2955U is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q3 2013. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Haswell microarchitecture. The 2955U is compatible with Intel Socket G3 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron 2955U supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron 2955U has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron 2955U features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1400.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron 2955U includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron 2955U has the 656th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.34% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Pentium N3710 CPU

The Intel Pentium N3710 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N3710 is compatible with FCBGA1170 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Pentium N3710 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 224 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pentium N3710 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2560.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Pentium N3710 does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Pentium N3710 has the 641st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.71% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron 2955UPentium N3710
ManufacturerIntelIntel
SeriesCeleron--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ3 2013--
Production StatusActive--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron 2955U
1,6044% of 36,991
Pentium N37109% better
1,742.55% of 36,991

The Pentium N3710 has 9% better performance than the Celeron 2955U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron 2955U is ranked 656th with a score of 1,604, and the Pentium N3710 is ranked 641st with a score of 1,742.5.

Performance per dollar
Celeron 2955U
No data available
Pentium N3710
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 2955U and the Pentium N3710 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 2955U or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Pentium N37001,768+10%
Pentium 3556U1,756+9%
Pentium N37101,742.5+9%
Core M-5Y311,738.5+8%
Core i5-4300Y1,738+8%
A9-94201,632+2%
Pentium N35101,619+1%
Celeron 2955U1,604
A4-62101,587.5-1%
Celeron N29201,582-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 2955U orPentium N3710
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron 2955UPentium N3710
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,604
1,742.5
(+8.63%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
--
145
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
--
41
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
455
--
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
266
--
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
877
1,381
(+57.47%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
781
(+14.01%)
685
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron 2955UPentium N3710
ManufacturerIntelIntel
FoundryIntel--
Process Size22 nm14 nm
Transistors1,400 million--

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron 2955UPentium N3710
SeriesCeleron--
MicroarchitectureHaswell--
CodenameHaswell--
Memory SupportDDR3--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron 2955UPentium N3710
Cores24
Threads24
Clock Speed1400.0 MHz1600.0 MHz
Turbo Clock--2560.0 MHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier14.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron 2955UPentium N3710
L1 Cache64 KB224 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB
L3 Cache2 MB0 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron 2955UPentium N3710
SocketIntel Socket G3FCBGA1170
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W6 W
Tcase Max72 °C--
TJ Max--90 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron 2955UPentium N3710
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD--
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EIST, 64-bit, XD bit, VT-x, Smart Cache--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.