Intel Celeron 1037U vs AMD Phenom II X4 N970

VS
Performance
Celeron 1037U
1,8805% of 36,991
Phenom II X4 N9703% better
1,9405% of 36,991

The Phenom II X4 N970 has 3% better performance than the Celeron 1037U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron 1037U
No data available
Phenom II X4 N970
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 1037U and the Phenom II X4 N970 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron 1037U
Shop Phenom II X4 N970
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron 1037U CPU

The Intel Celeron 1037U is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2013. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Ivy Bridge microarchitecture. The 1037U is compatible with Intel BGA 1023 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron 1037U supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Celeron 1037U has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron 1037U features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron 1037U includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron 1037U has the 625th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.08% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD Phenom II X4 N970 CPU

The AMD Phenom II X4 N970 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The X4 N970 is compatible with S1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 45 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Phenom II X4 N970 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 512 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Phenom II X4 N970 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2200.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Phenom II X4 N970 does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Phenom II X4 N970 has the 618th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.24% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron 1037UPhenom II X4 N970
ManufacturerIntelAMD
SeriesCeleron--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2013--
Production StatusActive--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron 1037U
1,8805% of 36,991
Phenom II X4 N9703% better
1,9405% of 36,991

The Phenom II X4 N970 has 3% better performance than the Celeron 1037U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron 1037U is ranked 625th with a score of 1,880, and the Phenom II X4 N970 is ranked 618th with a score of 1,940.

Performance per dollar
Celeron 1037U
No data available
Phenom II X4 N970
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 1037U and the Phenom II X4 N970 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 1037U or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Pentium B9701,989+6%
A6-52001,964.5+4%
Phenom II X4 N9701,940+3%
Celeron 63051,935.5+3%
Celeron N34501,925+2%
Celeron 3865U1,906+1%
A4-72101,886+0%
Celeron 1037U1,880
Celeron J40051,877-0%
Pentium N35301,875-0%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 1037U orPhenom II X4 N970
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron 1037UPhenom II X4 N970
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,880
1,940
(+3.19%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
524
--
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
310
--
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
998
1,662
(+66.53%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
936
(+3.65%)
903
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron 1037UPhenom II X4 N970
ManufacturerIntelAMD
FoundryIntel--
Process Size22 nm45 nm
Transistors1,400 million--

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron 1037UPhenom II X4 N970
SeriesCeleron--
MicroarchitectureIvy Bridge--
CodenameIvy Bridge--
Memory SupportDDR3--
Memory ChannelsDual-channel--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron 1037UPhenom II X4 N970
Cores24
Threads24
Clock Speed1800.0 MHz2200.0 MHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier18.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron 1037UPhenom II X4 N970
L1 Cache64 KB512 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB
L3 Cache2 MB--

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron 1037UPhenom II X4 N970
SocketIntel BGA 1023S1
Thermal Design Power (TDP)17 W35 W
Tcase Max105 °C--
TJ Max105 °C--

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron 1037UPhenom II X4 N970
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD--
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EIST, 64-bit, XD bit, VT-x, Smart Cache--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.