Intel Celeron 1017U vs Intel Core i3-380M

VS
Performance
Celeron 1017U
1,5324% of 36,991
Core i3-380M56% better
2,391.56% of 36,991

The Core i3-380M has 56% better performance than the Celeron 1017U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron 1017U
No data available
Core i3-380M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 1017U and the Core i3-380M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron 1017U
Shop Core i3-380M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron 1017U CPU

The Intel Celeron 1017U is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 1017U is compatible with FCBGA1023 motherboards and is fabricated on a 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron 1017U has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron 1017U features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron 1017U includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron 1017U has the 662nd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.14% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Core i3-380M CPU

The Intel Core i3-380M is an end-of-life 2-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2010. It is part of Intel's Core i3 lineup, which is based on the Arrandale microarchitecture. The i3-380M is compatible with Intel Socket G1 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 32 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

The Core i3-380M supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Core i3-380M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 3 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Core i3-380M features 2 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.5 GHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Core i3-380M does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i3-380M has the 577th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.47% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron 1017UCore i3-380M
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Series--Core i3
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q4 2010
Production Status--End-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron 1017U
1,5324% of 36,991
Core i3-380M56% better
2,391.56% of 36,991

The Core i3-380M has 56% better performance than the Celeron 1017U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron 1017U is ranked 662nd with a score of 1,532, and the Core i3-380M is ranked 577th with a score of 2,391.5.

Performance per dollar
Celeron 1017U
No data available
Core i3-380M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 1017U and the Core i3-380M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 1017U or
CPUBenchmark Performance
A10-9620P2,399+57%
FX-9800P2,393+56%
Core i3-380M2,391.5+56%
A10-9600P2,387+56%
Pentium Silver N50302,377+55%
A6-92251,568+2%
Phenom II X4 P9601,542+1%
Celeron 1017U1,532
A4-5150M1,531-0%
A9-94251,527-0%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 1017U orCore i3-380M
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron 1017UCore i3-380M
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,532
2,391.5
(+56.1%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
448
647
(+44.42%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
264
331
(+25.38%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
889
1,199
(+34.87%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
804
1,021
(+26.99%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron 1017UCore i3-380M
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Foundry--Intel
Process Size22 nm32 nm
Transistors--382 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron 1017UCore i3-380M
Series--Core i3
Microarchitecture--Arrandale
CodenameIvy BridgeArrandale
Memory Support--DDR3
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron 1017UCore i3-380M
Cores22
Threads24
Clock Speed1600.0 MHz2.5 GHz
Base Clock--133 MHz
Multiplier--19.0x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron 1017UCore i3-380M
L1 Cache128 KB64 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB
L3 Cache2 MB3 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron 1017UCore i3-380M
SocketFCBGA1023Intel Socket G1
PCI Express--PCIe 2.0
Thermal Design Power (TDP)17 W35 W
TJ Max105 °C105 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron 1017UCore i3-380M
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsMotherboard Dependent
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EIST, Intel 64, XD bit, TXT, VT-x, VT-d, HTT, Turbo Boost, AES-NI, Smart Cache

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.