Intel Celeron 1017U vs AMD E-240
The Celeron 1017U has 470% better performance than the E-240 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 1017U and the E-240 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel Celeron 1017U CPU
The Intel Celeron 1017U is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 1017U is compatible with FCBGA1023 motherboards and is fabricated on a 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Celeron 1017U has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron 1017U features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron 1017U includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron 1017U has the 661st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.14% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the AMD E-240 CPU
The AMD E-240 is an end-of-life 1-core (1-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2011. It is part of AMD's E lineup, which is based on the Zacate microarchitecture. The E-240 is compatible with AMD Socket FT1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 40 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6310 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The E-240 supports DDR3 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the E-240 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The E-240 is a single-core and single-threaded CPU, making it not capable of processing multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1500.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The E-240 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6310. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The E-240 has the 720th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 0.73% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Celeron 1017U | E-240 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Series | -- | E |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | -- | Q1 2011 |
| Production Status | -- | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron 1017U has 470% better performance than the E-240 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Celeron 1017U is ranked 661st with a score of 1,532, and the E-240 is ranked 720th with a score of 269.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 1017U and the E-240 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| A6-9225 | 1,568 | +2% |
| Phenom II X4 P960 | 1,542 | +1% |
| Celeron 1017U | 1,532 | |
| A4-5150M | 1,531 | -0% |
| A9-9425 | 1,527 | -0% |
| C-70 | 517 | -66% |
| C-50 | 374 | -76% |
| E-240 | 269 | -82% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Celeron 1017U | E-240 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,532 (+469.52%) | 269 |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 448 | -- |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 264 | -- |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 889 (+355.9%) | 195 |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 804 (+99.5%) | 403 |
Technical Specs
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Celeron 1017U | E-240 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Process Size | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Celeron 1017U | E-240 |
|---|---|---|
| Series | -- | E |
| Microarchitecture | -- | Zacate |
| Codename | Ivy Bridge | Zacate |
| Memory Support | -- | DDR3 |
| Memory Channels | -- | Single-channel |
| ECC Memory | -- | No |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron 1017U | E-240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Clock Speed | 1600.0 MHz | 1500.0 MHz |
| Base Clock | -- | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | -- | 15.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | -- | No |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron 1017U | E-240 |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | -- |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Celeron 1017U | E-240 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1023 | AMD Socket FT1 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 W | 18 W |
| TJ Max | 105 °C | -- |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Celeron 1017U | E-240 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors | Radeon HD 6310 |
| Extensions / Technologies | -- | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.