Performance
Celeron 1000M
1,7795% of 36,991
Celeron J40056% better
1,8775% of 36,991
The Celeron J4005 has 6% better performance than the Celeron 1000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Celeron 1000M
No data available
Celeron J4005
17.5414% of 121.53
The Celeron J4005 has 14% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark: Intel Core i5-13400F.
Shop Celeron 1000M
Shop Celeron J4005
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Celeron 1000M CPU
The Intel Celeron 1000M is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2013. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Ivy Bridge microarchitecture. The 1000M is compatible with Intel Socket G2 (988B) motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The Celeron 1000M supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Celeron 1000M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron 1000M features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron 1000M includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron 1000M has the 638th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.81% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the Intel Celeron J4005 CPU
The Intel Celeron J4005 is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2017 with a suggested retail price of $107. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Goldmont Plus microarchitecture. The J4005 is compatible with Intel BGA 1090 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the UHD Graphics 600 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The Celeron J4005 supports DDR4 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Celeron J4005 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 4 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron J4005 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2000.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2.7 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron J4005 includes an integrated graphics solution called UHD Graphics 600. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The Celeron J4005 has the 626th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.07% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Its 1,877 score and $107 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 17.54. This is the 169th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Perf. Physics benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Celeron 1000M | Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Celeron | Celeron |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2013 | Q4 2017 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $107 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Celeron 1000M
1,7795% of 36,991
Celeron J40056% better
1,8775% of 36,991
The Celeron J4005 has 6% better performance than the Celeron 1000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Celeron 1000M is ranked 638th with a score of 1,779, and the Celeron J4005 is ranked 626th with a score of 1,877.
Performance per dollar
Celeron 1000M
No data available
Celeron J4005
17.5414% of 121.53
The Celeron J4005 has 33% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
Celeron J4005's 17.54 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked CPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 1000M or
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Core m5-6Y54 | 2,529 | +42% |
| Celeron 3865U | 1,906 | +7% |
| Celeron J4005 | 1,877 | +6% |
| Pentium 3558U | 1,787 | +0% |
| Pentium 2127U | 1,782 | +0% |
| Celeron 1000M | 1,779 | |
| Pentium N3700 | 1,768 | -1% |
| Pentium 3556U | 1,756 | -1% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 1000M orCeleron J4005
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Core i5-8265U | 20.95 | +19% |
| Core i3-7100H | 20.26 | +16% |
| Pentium Gold 5405U | 19.56 | +11% |
| Core i7-4712HQ | 18.49 | +5% |
| Celeron 3865U | 17.81 | +2% |
| Celeron J4005 | 17.54 | |
| Core i7-4702MQ | 16.62 | -5% |
| Pentium Silver N5000 | 16.27 | -7% |
| Core i3-N300 | 16.13 | -8% |
| Core i3-8145U | 15.19 | -13% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Celeron 1000M | Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,779 | 1,877 (+5.51%) |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | -- | 144 |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | -- | 77 |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 508 | 577 (+13.58%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 297 | 343 (+15.49%) |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 1,075 | 1,567 (+45.77%) |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 976 | 1,096 (+12.3%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Celeron 1000M | Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Process Size | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | 1,400 million | -- |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Celeron 1000M | Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| Series | Celeron | Celeron |
| Microarchitecture | Ivy Bridge | Goldmont Plus |
| Codename | Ivy Bridge | Gemini Lake |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Memory Channels | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |
| ECC Memory | No | No |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron 1000M | Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 2 |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Clock Speed | 1800.0 MHz | 2000.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | -- | 2.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 18.0x | 20.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Celeron 1000M | Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 56 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 4 MB |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | -- |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Celeron 1000M | Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Intel BGA 1090 |
| PCI Express | -- | PCIe 2.0 x6 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 W | 10 W |
| Tcase Max | 105 °C | -- |
| TJ Max | 105 °C | 105 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Celeron 1000M | Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD | UHD Graphics 600 |
| Extensions / Technologies | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EIST, 64-bit, XD bit, VT-x, Smart Cache | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, AES-NI, SHA, F16C, EM64T, VT-x, VT-d, EPT, EIST, XD-bit, SGX |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.