Intel Celeron 1000M vs Intel Celeron 2957U

VS
Performance
Celeron 1000M17% better
1,7795% of 36,991
Celeron 2957U
1,5244% of 36,991

The Celeron 1000M has 17% better performance than the Celeron 2957U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron 1000M
No data available
Celeron 2957U
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 1000M and the Celeron 2957U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron 1000M
Shop Celeron 2957U
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron 1000M CPU

The Intel Celeron 1000M is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2013. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Ivy Bridge microarchitecture. The 1000M is compatible with Intel Socket G2 (988B) motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron 1000M supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Celeron 1000M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron 1000M features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron 1000M includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron 1000M has the 638th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.81% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron 2957U CPU

The Intel Celeron 2957U is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 2957U is compatible with FCBGA1168 motherboards and is fabricated on a 22 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron 2957U has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron 2957U features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1400.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron 2957U does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron 2957U has the 665th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.12% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron 1000MCeleron 2957U
ManufacturerIntelIntel
SeriesCeleron--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2013--
Production StatusActive--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron 1000M17% better
1,7795% of 36,991
Celeron 2957U
1,5244% of 36,991

The Celeron 1000M has 17% better performance than the Celeron 2957U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron 1000M is ranked 638th with a score of 1,779, and the Celeron 2957U is ranked 665th with a score of 1,524.

Performance per dollar
Celeron 1000M
No data available
Celeron 2957U
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 1000M and the Celeron 2957U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 1000M or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Pentium 3558U1,787+0%
Pentium 2127U1,782+0%
Celeron 1000M1,779
Pentium N37001,768-1%
Pentium 3556U1,756-1%
A4-5150M1,531-14%
A9-94251,527-14%
Celeron 2957U1,524-14%
Celeron N31501,516-15%
Celeron N45001,507-15%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 1000M orCeleron 2957U
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron 1000MCeleron 2957U
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,779
(+16.73%)
1,524
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
--
105
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
--
55
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
508
--
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
297
--
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,075
(+25.44%)
857
CPU Mark Single-Thread
976
(+25.29%)
779
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron 1000MCeleron 2957U
ManufacturerIntelIntel
FoundryIntel--
Process Size22 nm22 nm
Transistors1,400 million--

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron 1000MCeleron 2957U
SeriesCeleron--
MicroarchitectureIvy Bridge--
CodenameIvy Bridge--
Memory SupportDDR3--
Memory ChannelsDual-channel--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron 1000MCeleron 2957U
Cores22
Threads22
Clock Speed1800.0 MHz1400.0 MHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier18.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron 1000MCeleron 2957U
L1 Cache64 KB128 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron 1000MCeleron 2957U
SocketIntel Socket G2 (988B)FCBGA1168
Thermal Design Power (TDP)35 W15 W
Tcase Max105 °C--
TJ Max105 °C--

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron 1000MCeleron 2957U
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD--
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EIST, 64-bit, XD bit, VT-x, Smart Cache--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.