Intel Celeron 1000M vs AMD Phenom II X4 P960

VS
Performance
Celeron 1000M15% better
1,7795% of 36,991
Phenom II X4 P960
1,5424% of 36,991

The Celeron 1000M has 15% better performance than the Phenom II X4 P960 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Celeron 1000M
No data available
Phenom II X4 P960
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 1000M and the Phenom II X4 P960 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron 1000M
Shop Phenom II X4 P960
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Celeron 1000M CPU

The Intel Celeron 1000M is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2013. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Ivy Bridge microarchitecture. The 1000M is compatible with Intel Socket G2 (988B) motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron 1000M supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Celeron 1000M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron 1000M features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron 1000M includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron 1000M has the 638th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.81% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD Phenom II X4 P960 CPU

The AMD Phenom II X4 P960 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The X4 P960 is compatible with S1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 45 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Phenom II X4 P960 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 512 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Phenom II X4 P960 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Phenom II X4 P960 does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Phenom II X4 P960 has the 661st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.17% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoCeleron 1000MPhenom II X4 P960
ManufacturerIntelAMD
SeriesCeleron--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2013--
Production StatusActive--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Celeron 1000M15% better
1,7795% of 36,991
Phenom II X4 P960
1,5424% of 36,991

The Celeron 1000M has 15% better performance than the Phenom II X4 P960 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Celeron 1000M is ranked 638th with a score of 1,779, and the Phenom II X4 P960 is ranked 661st with a score of 1,542.

Performance per dollar
Celeron 1000M
No data available
Phenom II X4 P960
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Celeron 1000M and the Phenom II X4 P960 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 1000M or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Pentium 3558U1,787+0%
Pentium 2127U1,782+0%
Celeron 1000M1,779
Pentium N37001,768-1%
Pentium 3556U1,756-1%
Celeron N29201,582-11%
A6-92251,568-12%
Phenom II X4 P9601,542-13%
Celeron 1017U1,532-14%
A4-5150M1,531-14%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Celeron 1000M orPhenom II X4 P960
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkCeleron 1000MPhenom II X4 P960
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,779
(+15.37%)
1,542
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
508
--
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
297
--
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,075
1,386
(+28.93%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
976
(+32.43%)
737
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecCeleron 1000MPhenom II X4 P960
ManufacturerIntelAMD
FoundryIntel--
Process Size22 nm45 nm
Transistors1,400 million--

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecCeleron 1000MPhenom II X4 P960
SeriesCeleron--
MicroarchitectureIvy Bridge--
CodenameIvy Bridge--
Memory SupportDDR3--
Memory ChannelsDual-channel--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron 1000MPhenom II X4 P960
Cores24
Threads24
Clock Speed1800.0 MHz1800.0 MHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier18.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecCeleron 1000MPhenom II X4 P960
L1 Cache64 KB512 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB
L3 Cache2 MB--

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecCeleron 1000MPhenom II X4 P960
SocketIntel Socket G2 (988B)S1
Thermal Design Power (TDP)35 W25 W
Tcase Max105 °C--
TJ Max105 °C--

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecCeleron 1000MPhenom II X4 P960
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD--
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EIST, 64-bit, XD bit, VT-x, Smart Cache--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.