Performance
Atom x7-Z8700
1,1863% of 36,991
Celeron N345062% better
1,9255% of 36,991
The Celeron N3450 has 62% better performance than the Atom x7-Z8700 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Atom x7-Z8700
No data available
Celeron N3450
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Atom x7-Z8700 and the Celeron N3450 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Shop Atom x7-Z8700
Shop Celeron N3450
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Atom x7-Z8700 CPU
The Intel Atom x7-Z8700 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The x7-Z8700 is compatible with UTFCBGA1380 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Atom x7-Z8700 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 448 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Atom x7-Z8700 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Atom x7-Z8700 does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.
Benchmark Performance
The Atom x7-Z8700 has the 693rd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.21% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the Intel Celeron N3450 CPU
The Intel Celeron N3450 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N3450 is compatible with Socket 1296 FCBGA motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics 500 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Celeron N3450 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 896 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron N3450 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2200.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron N3450 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics 500. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron N3450 has the 620th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.20% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Atom x7-Z8700 | Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Atom x7-Z8700
1,1863% of 36,991
Celeron N345062% better
1,9255% of 36,991
The Celeron N3450 has 62% better performance than the Atom x7-Z8700 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Atom x7-Z8700 is ranked 693rd with a score of 1,186, and the Celeron N3450 is ranked 620th with a score of 1,925.
Performance per dollar
Atom x7-Z8700
No data available
Celeron N3450
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Atom x7-Z8700 and the Celeron N3450 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline CPU:Atom x7-Z8700 or
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 N970 | 1,940 | +64% |
| Celeron 6305 | 1,935.5 | +63% |
| Celeron N3450 | 1,925 | +62% |
| Core i3-2365M | 1,915 | +61% |
| Celeron 3865U | 1,906 | +61% |
| E2-9000 | 1,199 | +1% |
| A6-1450 | 1,193.5 | +1% |
| Atom x7-Z8700 | 1,186 | |
| Atom Z3736F | 1,144 | -4% |
| Pentium 2129Y | 1,138 | -4% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline CPU:Atom x7-Z8700 orCeleron N3450
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Atom x7-Z8700 | Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,186 | 1,925 (+62.31%) |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 116 | 143 (+23.28%) |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 37.5 | 44.5 (+18.67%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 500 | 653 (+30.6%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 177 | 240 (+35.59%) |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 1,334 | 1,987 (+48.95%) |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 651 | 767 (+17.82%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Atom x7-Z8700 | Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Atom x7-Z8700 | Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Cherry Trail | Apollo Lake |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Atom x7-Z8700 | Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Clock Speed | 1600.0 MHz | 1100.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 2400.0 MHz | 2200.0 MHz |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Atom x7-Z8700 | Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 0 MB | 0 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Atom x7-Z8700 | Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | UTFCBGA1380 | Socket 1296 FCBGA |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4 W | 6 W |
| TJ Max | 90 °C | 105 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Atom x7-Z8700 | Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | -- | Intel HD Graphics 500 |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.