Intel Atom x7-Z8700 vs Intel Celeron N2920

VS
Performance
Atom x7-Z8700
1,1863% of 36,991
Celeron N292033% better
1,5824% of 36,991

The Celeron N2920 has 33% better performance than the Atom x7-Z8700 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Atom x7-Z8700
No data available
Celeron N2920
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Atom x7-Z8700 and the Celeron N2920 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Atom x7-Z8700
Shop Celeron N2920
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Atom x7-Z8700 CPU

The Intel Atom x7-Z8700 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The x7-Z8700 is compatible with UTFCBGA1380 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Atom x7-Z8700 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 448 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Atom x7-Z8700 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Atom x7-Z8700 does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Atom x7-Z8700 has the 693rd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.21% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron N2920 CPU

The Intel Celeron N2920 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2013. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Bay Trail microarchitecture. The N2920 is compatible with Intel BGA 1170 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron N2920 supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron N2920 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N2920 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1860.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2000.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N2920 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N2920 has the 659th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.28% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoAtom x7-Z8700Celeron N2920
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Series--Celeron
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q4 2013
Production Status--Active
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Atom x7-Z8700
1,1863% of 36,991
Celeron N292033% better
1,5824% of 36,991

The Celeron N2920 has 33% better performance than the Atom x7-Z8700 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Atom x7-Z8700 is ranked 693rd with a score of 1,186, and the Celeron N2920 is ranked 659th with a score of 1,582.

Performance per dollar
Atom x7-Z8700
No data available
Celeron N2920
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Atom x7-Z8700 and the Celeron N2920 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Atom x7-Z8700 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Celeron 2955U1,604+35%
A4-62101,587.5+34%
Celeron N29201,582+33%
A6-92251,568+32%
Phenom II X4 P9601,542+30%
E2-90001,199+1%
A6-14501,193.5+1%
Atom x7-Z87001,186
Atom Z3736F1,144-4%
Pentium 2129Y1,138-4%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Atom x7-Z8700 orCeleron N2920
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkAtom x7-Z8700Celeron N2920
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,186
1,582
(+33.39%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
116
118.5
(+2.16%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
37.5
(+15.38%)
32.5
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
500
--
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
177
--
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,334
(+40.42%)
950
CPU Mark Single-Thread
651
(+17.93%)
552
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecAtom x7-Z8700Celeron N2920
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Foundry--Intel
Process Size14 nm22 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecAtom x7-Z8700Celeron N2920
Series--Celeron
Microarchitecture--Bay Trail
CodenameCherry TrailBay Trail-M
Memory Support--DDR3
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecAtom x7-Z8700Celeron N2920
Cores44
Threads44
Clock Speed1600.0 MHz1860.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2400.0 MHz2000.0 MHz
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecAtom x7-Z8700Celeron N2920
L1 Cache448 KB56 KB
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB
L3 Cache0 MB--

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecAtom x7-Z8700Celeron N2920
SocketUTFCBGA1380Intel BGA 1170
Thermal Design Power (TDP)4 W7 W
TJ Max90 °C105 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecAtom x7-Z8700Celeron N2920
Integrated Graphics--HD Graphics
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EIST, XD bit, BPT, NX

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.