Intel Atom x7-E3950 vs Intel Celeron N6211

VS
Performance
Atom x7-E395013% better
1,7935% of 36,991
Celeron N6211
1,5914% of 36,991

The Atom x7-E3950 has 13% better performance than the Celeron N6211 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Atom x7-E3950
No data available
Celeron N6211
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Atom x7-E3950 and the Celeron N6211 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Atom x7-E3950
Shop Celeron N6211
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Atom x7-E3950 CPU

The Intel Atom x7-E3950 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the embedded CPU market. It launched in Q3 2014. It is part of Intel's Atom x7 lineup, which is based on the Apollo Lake microarchitecture. The x7-E3950 is compatible with Intel BGA 1296 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics 505 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Atom x7-E3950 supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Atom x7-E3950 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Atom x7-E3950 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2000.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Atom x7-E3950 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics 505. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Atom x7-E3950 has the 635th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.85% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron N6211 CPU

The Intel Celeron N6211 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the embedded CPU market. The N6211 is compatible with FCBGA1493 motherboards and is fabricated on a 10 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N6211 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 4,096 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1.5 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N6211 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1200.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3000.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N6211 does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N6211 has the 657th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.30% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoAtom x7-E3950Celeron N6211
ManufacturerIntelIntel
SeriesAtom x7--
Market SegmentEmbeddedEmbedded
Release DateQ3 2014--
Production StatusActive--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Atom x7-E395013% better
1,7935% of 36,991
Celeron N6211
1,5914% of 36,991

The Atom x7-E3950 has 13% better performance than the Celeron N6211 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Atom x7-E3950 is ranked 635th with a score of 1,793, and the Celeron N6211 is ranked 657th with a score of 1,591.

Performance per dollar
Atom x7-E3950
No data available
Celeron N6211
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Atom x7-E3950 and the Celeron N6211 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Atom x7-E3950 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Ryzen Embedded V1605B7,177+300%
Atom x7-E39501,793
Celeron N62111,591-11%
Atom x5-E80001,494-17%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Atom x7-E3950 orCeleron N6211
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkAtom x7-E3950Celeron N6211
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,793
(+12.7%)
1,591
3DMark Time Spy CPU
667
--
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
125
128
(+2.4%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
41
76
(+85.37%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
718
--
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
231
--
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
2,096
2,245
(+7.11%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
742
1,586
(+113.75%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecAtom x7-E3950Celeron N6211
ManufacturerIntelIntel
FoundryIntel--
Process Size14 nm10 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecAtom x7-E3950Celeron N6211
SeriesAtom x7--
MicroarchitectureApollo Lake--
CodenameApollo Lake--
Memory SupportDDR3--
Memory ChannelsDual-channel--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecAtom x7-E3950Celeron N6211
Cores42
Threads42
Clock Speed1600.0 MHz1200.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2000.0 MHz3000.0 MHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier16.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecAtom x7-E3950Celeron N6211
L1 Cache56 KB4,096 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache--4 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecAtom x7-E3950Celeron N6211
SocketIntel BGA 1296FCBGA1493
PCI ExpressPCIe 2.0 x4--
Thermal Design Power (TDP)12 W6.5 W
Tcase Max103 °C--
TJ Max110 °C70 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecAtom x7-E3950Celeron N6211
Integrated GraphicsHD Graphics 505--
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, SHA, EIST, Intel 64, XD bit, VT-x, VT-d, TXT, EPT, BPT, AES-NI, CLMUL, RdRand--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.