Intel Atom x5-Z8500 vs AMD A9-9425
The A9-9425 has 13% better performance than the Atom x5-Z8500 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Atom x5-Z8500 and the A9-9425 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel Atom x5-Z8500 CPU
The Intel Atom x5-Z8500 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The x5-Z8500 is compatible with UTFCBGA1380 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Atom x5-Z8500 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 224 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Atom x5-Z8500 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1440.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2240.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Atom x5-Z8500 does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.
Benchmark Performance
The Atom x5-Z8500 has the 677th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.66% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the AMD A9-9425 CPU
The AMD A9-9425 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2016. It is part of AMD's A9 lineup, which is based on the Stoney Ridge microarchitecture. The A9-9425 is compatible with AMD Socket FT4 motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R5 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The A9-9425 supports DDR4 memory. In terms of cache, the A9-9425 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The A9-9425 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 3.1 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.7 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The A9-9425 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R5. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The A9-9425 has the 663rd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.13% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Atom x5-Z8500 | A9-9425 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Series | -- | A9 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | -- | Q2 2016 |
| Production Status | -- | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
The A9-9425 has 13% better performance than the Atom x5-Z8500 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Atom x5-Z8500 is ranked 677th with a score of 1,353, and the A9-9425 is ranked 663rd with a score of 1,527.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Atom x5-Z8500 and the A9-9425 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Celeron 1017U | 1,532 | +13% |
| A4-5150M | 1,531 | +13% |
| A9-9425 | 1,527 | +13% |
| Celeron 2957U | 1,524 | +13% |
| Celeron N3150 | 1,516 | +12% |
| Pentium 3560Y | 1,365 | +1% |
| A4-4300M | 1,355 | +0% |
| Atom x5-Z8500 | 1,353 | |
| Atom Z3745D | 1,345 | -1% |
| A4-3305M | 1,338.5 | -1% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Atom x5-Z8500 | A9-9425 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,353 | 1,527 (+12.86%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy CPU | -- | 705 |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 106.5 | 125 (+17.37%) |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 35.5 | 76 (+114.08%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 482 | -- |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 170 | -- |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 1,237 | 1,507 (+21.83%) |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 632 | 1,322 (+109.18%) |
Technical Specs
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Atom x5-Z8500 | A9-9425 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 1,200 million |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Atom x5-Z8500 | A9-9425 |
|---|---|---|
| Series | -- | A9 |
| Microarchitecture | -- | Stoney Ridge |
| Codename | Cherry Trail | Stoney Ridge |
| Memory Support | -- | DDR4 |
| ECC Memory | -- | No |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Atom x5-Z8500 | A9-9425 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Clock Speed | 1440.0 MHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Turbo Clock | 2240.0 MHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | -- | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | -- | 31.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | -- | No |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Atom x5-Z8500 | A9-9425 |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | 0 MB | -- |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Atom x5-Z8500 | A9-9425 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | UTFCBGA1380 | AMD Socket FT4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 2 W | 15 W |
| Tcase Max | -- | 74 °C |
| TJ Max | 90 °C | 90 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Atom x5-Z8500 | A9-9425 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | -- | Radeon R5 |
| Extensions / Technologies | -- | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD64, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, FMA3, FMA4, F16C, TBM, XOP, AMD-V, EVP, Turbo Core |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.