Intel Atom x5-Z8500 vs AMD A4-3300M
The A4-3300M has 3% better performance than the Atom x5-Z8500 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Atom x5-Z8500 and the A4-3300M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel Atom x5-Z8500 CPU
The Intel Atom x5-Z8500 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The Atom x5-Z8500 is compatible with UTFCBGA1380 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process.
The Atom x5-Z8500 operates at a 1440.0 MHz clock frequency, and can boost to 2240.0 MHz. It has 224 KB of L1 cache, 2 MB of L2 cache, and 0 MB of L3 cache.
The Atom x5-Z8500 has the 672nd highest 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 715 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.66% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the AMD A4-3300M CPU
The AMD A4-3300M is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2011. It is part of AMD's A4 lineup, which is based on the Llano microarchitecture. The A4-3300M is compatible with AMD Socket FS1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 32 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6480G integrated graphics solution.
The A4-3300M operates at a 1900.0 MHz clock frequency, and can boost to 2.5 GHz. Its multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking. It has a L1 cache of 128 KB, and a L2 cache of 1 MB. This processor supports DDR3 memory with a Dual-channel interface.
The A4-3300M has the 669th highest 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 715 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.77% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
Info | Atom x5-Z8500 | A4-3300M |
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
Series | -- | A4 |
Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Release Date | -- | Q2 2011 |
Production Status | -- | End-of-life |
Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
The A4-3300M has 3% better performance than the Atom x5-Z8500 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Atom x5-Z8500 is ranked 672nd with a score of 1,353, and the A4-3300M is ranked 669th with a score of 1,396.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Atom x5-Z8500 and the A4-3300M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
---|---|---|
E2-3800 | 1,440 | +6% |
A6-5350M | 1,414.5 | +5% |
A6-4400M | 1,403 | +4% |
A4-3300M | 1,396 | +3% |
Pentium 3560Y | 1,365 | +1% |
A4-4300M | 1,355 | +0% |
Atom x5-Z8500 | 1,353 | |
Atom Z3745D | 1,345 | -1% |
A4-3305M | 1,338.5 | -1% |
Celeron N3350 | 1,333 | -1% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
---|---|---|---|
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
Benchmark | Atom x5-Z8500 | A4-3300M |
---|---|---|
3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,353 | 1,396 (+3.18%) |
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 106.5 | -- |
Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 35.5 | -- |
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 482 (+20.8%) | 399 |
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 170 | 227 (+33.53%) |
CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 1,237 (+74.23%) | 710 |
CPU Mark Single-Thread | 632 | 788 (+24.68%) |
Technical Specs
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
Spec | Atom x5-Z8500 | A4-3300M |
---|---|---|
Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
Process Size | 14 nm | 32 nm |
Transistors | -- | 1,178 million |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
Spec | Atom x5-Z8500 | A4-3300M |
---|---|---|
Series | -- | A4 |
Microarchitecture | -- | Llano |
Codename | Cherry Trail | Llano |
Memory Support | -- | DDR3 |
Memory Channels | -- | Dual-channel |
ECC Memory | -- | No |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
Spec | Atom x5-Z8500 | A4-3300M |
---|---|---|
Cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Clock Speed | 1440.0 MHz | 1900.0 MHz |
Turbo Clock | 2240.0 MHz | 2.5 GHz |
Base Clock | -- | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | -- | 19.0x |
Multiplier Unlocked | -- | No |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
Spec | Atom x5-Z8500 | A4-3300M |
---|---|---|
L1 Cache | 224 KB | 128 KB |
L2 Cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
L3 Cache | 0 MB | -- |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
Spec | Atom x5-Z8500 | A4-3300M |
---|---|---|
Socket | UTFCBGA1380 | AMD Socket FS1 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 2 W | 35 W |
TJ Max | 90 °C | -- |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
Spec | Atom x5-Z8500 | A4-3300M |
---|---|---|
Integrated Graphics | -- | Radeon HD 6480G |
Extensions / Technologies | -- | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Power Now!, NX bit, AMD-V |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.