AMD Pro A12-8800B vs AMD C-50

VS
Performance
Pro A12-8800B531% better
2,3616% of 36,991
C-50
3741% of 36,991

The Pro A12-8800B has 531% better performance than the C-50 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Pro A12-8800B
No data available
C-50
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Pro A12-8800B and the C-50 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Pro A12-8800B
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Pro A12-8800B CPU

The AMD Pro A12-8800B is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The Pro A12-8800B is compatible with Socket FP4 (968) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R7 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Pro A12-8800B has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 512 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro A12-8800B features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Pro A12-8800B includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R7 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro A12-8800B has the 581st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.38% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD C-50 CPU

The AMD C-50 is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2011. It is part of AMD's C lineup, which is based on the Ontario microarchitecture. The C-50 is compatible with AMD Socket FT1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 40 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6250 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The C-50 supports DDR3 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the C-50 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The C-50 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1000.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The C-50 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6250. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The C-50 has the 720th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 1.01% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoPro A12-8800BC-50
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Series--C
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q1 2011
Production Status--End-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Pro A12-8800B531% better
2,3616% of 36,991
C-50
3741% of 36,991

The Pro A12-8800B has 531% better performance than the C-50 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The Pro A12-8800B is ranked 581st with a score of 2,361, and the C-50 is ranked 720th with a score of 374.

Performance per dollar
Pro A12-8800B
No data available
C-50
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Pro A12-8800B and the C-50 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:Pro A12-8800B or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Pentium Silver N50302,377+1%
Core M-5Y702,373+1%
Pro A12-8800B2,361
A6-3420M2,346.5-1%
Core i3-4010U2,340-1%
A6-9220e529-78%
C-70517-78%
C-50374-84%
E-240269-89%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:Pro A12-8800B orC-50
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkPro A12-8800BC-50
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
2,361
(+531.28%)
374
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
206
--
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
72
--
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
1,153
(+829.84%)
124
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
517
(+628.17%)
71
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
2,580
(+873.58%)
265
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,315
(+321.47%)
312
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecPro A12-8800BC-50
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Process Size28 nm40 nm
Transistors3,100 million--

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecPro A12-8800BC-50
Series--C
Microarchitecture--Ontario
CodenameCarrizoOntario
Memory Support--DDR3
Memory Channels--Single-channel
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecPro A12-8800BC-50
Cores42
Threads42
Clock Speed2100.0 MHz1000.0 MHz
Turbo Clock3400.0 MHz--
Base Clock--100 MHz
Multiplier--10.0x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecPro A12-8800BC-50
L1 Cache512 KB64 KB
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecPro A12-8800BC-50
SocketSocket FP4 (968)AMD Socket FT1
Thermal Design Power (TDP)35 W9 W

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecPro A12-8800BC-50
Integrated GraphicsRadeon R7 SeriesRadeon HD 6250
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.